20 years after the US invasion – violence, destruction, climate change: Iraq remains a powder keg – News


Contents

UN chief António Guterres visits Iraq. It has become quiet around the shattered country. But the problems are immense.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres is currently in Iraq – for the first time in six years. Upon his arrival in Baghdad, he spoke of a “visit of solidarity with the people and the democratic institutions of Iraq”.

This month marks the 20th anniversary of the US-led invasion of Iraq. The dictator Saddam Hussein was overthrown within a few weeks. It was the end of decades of terror – and the beginning of the next martyrdom for the Iraqi people. Iraq sank into chaos, hundreds of thousands of people would die.

The Third Gulf War under George W. Bush


open box
close the box

Legend:

US soldiers invaded Iraq from Kuwait in March 2003.

Keystone/AP/James Matise

On March 17, 2003, then-US President George W. Bush gave Saddam Hussein an ultimatum to leave Iraq within 48 hours or Iraq would be attacked. On Hussein’s refusal, the war coalition launched the war known as Operation Iraqi Freedom on the night of March 19/20 with targeted bombardments in Baghdad.

The warring governments of the USA and Great Britain cited an acute threat from Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and its alleged connection to the terrorist network al-Qaeda, which carried out the attacks of September 11, 2001, as justification for the invasion.

The reason for the war later turned out to be mostly a lie. Former, late US Secretary of State Colin Powell admitted in 2011 that the intelligence information the US used to justify its war of aggression in Iraq was “based on a single, unreliable source”. Over a million Iraqis were killed in the Iraq War and the wars that followed.

Sectarian violence swept the country, the “coalition of the willing” became embroiled in a war in which there were only losers, and an offshoot of the terrorist organization al-Qaeda installed itself in Iraq. The IS would later emerge from it.

Iraq is marked by the consequences of the American war of aggression twenty years ago.

“The challenges Iraq is facing did not arise overnight,” said Guterres, flanked by Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani. “They are the product of decades of oppression, of war, terrorism and foreign interference.”

But how is the situation today? “Iraq is marked by the consequences of the American war of aggression twenty years ago,” says Susanne Brunner. She traveled the country several times during her time as SRF’s Middle East correspondent.

Huge Challenges

Guterres emphasized in Baghdad that the situation had improved compared to previous years. “But better is far from good,” Brunner puts it into perspective. “The country has huge problems.”

There are still hundreds of thousands of displaced people in their own country, climate change, corruption and food insecurity are troubling Iraq. Just like the strong influence of its neighboring country Iran.

Brunner was last in Iraq in late summer 2022. “At first glance, things looked better in Baghdad than in Beirut,” reports SRF’s current foreign editor. “There was electricity half the day, people sat in cafés and on streets where there were attacks almost every day just a few years ago.”

But the peaceful appearance was deceptive. “The country was seething,” Brunner recalls. A power struggle raged in Baghdad between forces loyal to Iran and supporters of the Iraqi nationalist Muqtada al-Sadr. In other parts of the country, IS, which had regained strength, terrorized people.

The government cannot guarantee security in the country – and without it there is no development.

After years of political stalemate, Iraq has had a new government since last October. Upon his arrival, Guterres praised their “ambitious reform agenda” and promised the support of the UN.

Iraq does not determine its own fate

The government maintains close ties with the regional Shiite superpower Iran. But the real winners of last May’s elections are no longer represented: the supporters of Muqtada al-Sadr.

To date, Iraq is not really a sovereign state, concludes the Middle East expert: “Regional powers are involved, plundering the country’s resources and heating up internal conflicts.”

Brunner’s sad conclusion: Iraq would actually have everything. Raw materials, agricultural products, a partially very well educated youth. “But the government cannot guarantee security in the country – and without it there is no development.” After all, the UN chief’s visit is a sign that the world hasn’t completely forgotten about Iraq.

source site-72