A bitcoin address inactive since 2015 transfers $88.55 million


©Reuters

NEW YORK – In a notable development for cryptocurrency markets, a wallet that had been inactive for more than eight years suddenly transferred a significant amount of Bitcoin earlier this week. The wallet, known as “1DJs7,” had not seen activity since February 2015, but moved 2,101 BTC, worth approximately $88.55 million. This unexpected transaction caught the attention of the crypto community and sparked speculation about the possible reasons for this sudden move.

Funds from the “1DJs7” wallet have been distributed to two new addresses. The majority of bitcoins were sent to “1GtUy”, while a smaller portion was sent to “bc1qj”, which uses the Bech32 Segwit address format. Despite the large sums involved, the cost of the transaction was relatively low, approximately $26.77 or 290 satoshis per byte. However, according to Blockchair’s privacy tool, this transaction scored zero out of one hundred, indicating potential privacy issues.

This event follows another round of large transactions that took place last week, where four inactive Bitcoin addresses dating back to late 2016 were reactivated and moved approximately $30.93 million worth of Bitcoin (734.98 BTC). These transactions were confirmed at block heights 821,361 and 821,367.

The reactivation of these “dormant bitcoins” has sparked curiosity and debate among investors and analysts. While it is not uncommon for dormant addresses to become active again after a period of inactivity, the considerable amounts and long periods of inactivity that preceded these transactions are worth noting. The intentions behind these transfers remain unclear, leaving market observers to wonder whether they could be linked to personal portfolio adjustments, institutional moves or other strategic financial activities.

The developments highlight the unpredictable nature of cryptocurrency markets and the volatility that can result.

This article was generated and translated with the help of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information, see our T&Cs.



Source link -95