In a London cemetery, out of sight, is a secret corner. This spring, wild orchids have grown there. “But I will never reveal the location”, assures Sebastian Dunnett, in charge of ecology in Hammersmith and Fulham, a borough from the west of the British capital. The precious flowers were the surprise crowning the strategy followed by Mr. Dunnett. In May, under his leadership, the town hall did not mow any of its parks and public spaces, which still represent 17% of the area of the municipality. Gradually, the herbs grew, the wild flowers too, and the biodiversity buried in the land finally had the opportunity to express itself.
By refusing to take out the mowers, Hammersmith and Fulham town hall joined this year “No Mow May ” (“No mowing in May”), a major initiative launched by the Plantlife association three years ago. More than 30 municipalities, around 10% of the country’s total, participated this year. Several thousand Britons have done the same in their own backyards.
Wildly maintained grass
But we had to take precautions. The town hall has planted signs indicating that the growth of the grass was voluntary, aimed at strengthening biodiversity and pollinating insects. No question of giving the impression that the place was abandoned.
“If it were up to me, I would let the grass grow everywhere” – Sebastian Dunnett, ecology officer at Hammersmith and Fulham
Police were not in favor of the idea either: it’s easier to hide things in tall grass, and they feared anti-social behavior. “If it were up to me, as an environmentalist, I would let grass grow everywhere, but it is obvious that green spaces have different uses, explains Mr. Dunnett. Now we let the grass grow in less used areas of parks, but we cut where people want to have picnics or play soccer. “ Beyond May, the idea is not to ban mowing anyway, but simply to reduce the frequency. Because we do not laugh with its patch of grass in the United Kingdom, which likes to describe itself as a “green and pleasant land”, even pushing the vice until playing tennis on it.
In the English suburbs an intense and silent competition takes place with the one who will have the most beautiful garden. We glance discreetly over the wooden palisades to see if the grass is indeed greener on the other side. The codes are subtle, notes Kate Fox in her anthropology book Watching the English (ed. Hodder & Stoughton, 2005, untranslated): “The gardens of the upper social classes tend to appear more improvised, more natural […]. It can take a lot of effort and time to get there […], but it must not be seen. ” Mad weed is therefore only tolerated if it is clearly voluntary.
You have 24.47% of this article to read. The rest is for subscribers only.