Amber Heard will counterattack with a new strategy


fun, news, tips… what else?

Amber Heard is said to be developing a new defense strategy against Johnny Depp to appeal the verdict handed down in June.

Sentenced for defamation after a highly publicized lawsuit against Johnny Depp, Amber Heard intends to counterattack. After several weeks of confrontation and accusations, the actress had indeed been sentenced to pay 10 million dollars to her ex-husband for having accused him of domestic violence in an interview granted in 2018. But after having tried to have the verdict overturned for a formality (due to doubts about the identity of one of the jurors), the actress finally decided touse the First Amendment which guarantees freedom of speech. To build this new argument, she surrounded herself with lawyers David L. Axelrod and Jay Ward Brown, known for having successfully defended the New York Times against Sarah Palin earlier this year.

We welcome the opportunity to represent Ms. Heard in this appeal, as this is a case with significant First Amendment implications for every American,” they said in a press release, before adding: “ A new trial involves different lawyers, especially when new evidence comes to light”. According The Guardian, 6,000 pages of court documents were made public by fans of the actor who thought they were doing him justice. Ironically, the documents finally overwhelm Johnny Depp, in particular because they attest that the latter tampered with a recording on which we hear him arguing with Amber Heard.

Latest news

Amber Heard ready to do anything to overturn the verdict

Johnny Depp also reportedly claimed that the actress ” never hurt him physically or psychologically contrary to what he claimed during the trial. So many elements that undermine the actor’s reputation and that could perhaps play in favor of Amber Heard. Anyway, the initiative of the actress is not surprising. Shortly after the verdict, she let it be known that she would appeal. In particular because according to her lawyer Elaine Bredehott, she would not have ” absolutely not the means to pay $10 million in damages to Johnny Depp. As a reminder, the actor had also been convicted of defamation, but the jurors had largely ruled in his favor by condemning him to pay $ 2 million in damages to Amber Heard.

Barbara Azais

Social journalist, Barbara is particularly interested in human and social sciences (psychology, sociology and philosophy), feminism and health, well-being and…

source site-56