Are we living inside a vast “hole” in the universe? This is what these scientists believe


The Milky Way is just one speck among billions of others scattered across the vast expanse of the universe. Yet as astronomers peer into our galactic neighborhood, a disturbing revelation is emerging: we may be in the eye of an immense cosmic storm, a peculiar void that defies the fundamental laws governing our cosmos.

The Earth and the Moon
Credits: 123RF

For decades, cosmologists have adhered to the cosmological principle, a fundamental theory that states that matter in the universe should be uniformly distributed over the largest scales.. This principle allowed scientists to apply the same physical laws to near and distant objectsthus painting a coherent picture of a universe governed by universal rules.

However, growing evidence suggests that we inhabit a region of space where the distribution of matter is anything but uniform. Instead, we might find ourselves nestled in a cosmic void, a vast expanse of relative emptiness stretching an astonishing two billion light years. “ It is now obvious that we are in a significant underdensity”says Indranil Banik, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of St. Andrews and co-author of a recent study exploring this enigmatic void. “A few people still oppose it to some extent. For example, some have rightly argued that such a gap should not exist in the Standard Model, which is true. Unfortunately, this does not prove that it does not exist “.

Also read – Space junk could crash into your living room at any time, proof in pictures

The Earth would be in a cosmic void

Dubbed the “KBC void,” this gargantuan cavity is not entirely devoid of matter, since after all, it houses the Earth. However, if Banik and his colleagues’ calculations are correct, the vacuum would be about 20% less dense than the surrounding cosmos, a significant deficit that challenges our fundamental understanding of the evolution of the universe.

The existence of such a void is not a simple curiosity; it has profound implications for the laws of cosmology that govern the expansion of the universe. Astronomers rely on a value known as the Hubble constant to describe the rate at which the cosmos is expanding. According to current theories, this constant should be uniform throughout the universe.

Sun above the EarthSun above the Earth
Credits: 123RF

However, the movements of nearby galaxies and stars in a vacuum present a puzzling paradox: they seem to be moving away from us at a speed greater than that predicted by the Hubble constant. This divergence, called “Hubble tension », sparks debates and raises questions about the validity of our cosmological models.

Also read – Global warming: this group wants to launch a giant sunshade into space to save the Earth

This cosmic void could challenge our knowledge

Banik and his team propose that the void itself is the key to solving this conundrum. According to their theory, high-density regions beyond the boundaries of the vacuum exert a stronger gravitational pull, causing galaxies and stars located in the vacuum to accelerate outward at an increased rate. This flow could explain the high values ​​of the Hubble constant observed in our local cosmic neighborhood.

Keating, a cosmologist and professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego, notes that the implications of vacuum theory are not yet fully understood. If the local vacuum is not representative of the entire cosmos, it may be that this theory only provides a local solution and not a global one, which would not “resolve” the Hubble tension. Additionally, the study’s reliance on specific vacuum models and their inherent limitations means that the results, while compelling, do not constitute definitive proof of the existence of the vacuum or its ability to resolve the Hubble voltage.

The existence of this cosmic oddity, if confirmed, would require a reassessment of our current cosmological models, which could lead to a rewriting of the fundamental laws that govern the behavior of the universe. Although other explanations have been proposed, such as the theory of primitive dark energy, Banik argues that they are at odds with certain observational truths, such as the ages of ancient stars.



Source link -101