“Business leaders seem more comfortable when it comes to negotiating among themselves than when they have to submit to the governance of a collective”

LThe cream of American business is erasing democracy, or so their behavior suggests. Stephen Schwarzman, the head of the investment fund Blackstone, is one of the latest business leaders to publicly endorse Donald Trump for the next presidential election. The CEOs of major oil companies have done the same, and Jamie Dimon, chairman and CEO of JP Morgan Chase, recently said that Trump’s views on NATO, immigration, and many other important issues were going to “in the right direction”.

Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers In the United States, the rallying of bosses behind Donald Trump

Much has changed since January 2021, when Trump supporters stormed the Capitol to block the certification of the 2020 presidential election. In the weeks since the insurrection, many companies have solemnly vowed not to fund candidates who refuse to acknowledge Joe Biden’s undisputed victory. But those promises have proven to be little more than a windfall.

The business world has never been wildly enthusiastic about democratic governance. When its own operations are at stake, it prefers autocracy to self-governance. CEOs want their executives and employees to obey them, and shareholders, who are supposed to be in charge, are easily reassured if they are given good financial reasons; they rarely manage to unite for collective action, which is essential if managers are to be held accountable.

Read also | Article reserved for our subscribers In California, billionaires side with Donald Trump

What makes these corporate executives so powerful? The usual answer is to point to the control they enjoy over the assets of the company. This is what Karl Marx meant when he said that control of the means of production allows capitalists to extract surplus value from labor. This has since been abundantly justified by economic models showing that control of assets does indeed translate into domination over labor.

The legal tools of power

But things are a bit more complicated. Neither Schwarzman nor Dimon owns the machinery of their companies or the buildings that house the brokers, investors or bank employees they employ. While they do own shares of their empire in the form of stock, or options to buy more shares of their company, those holdings typically constitute only a fraction of all the shares outstanding. And while shareholders are often collectively defined as owners, their ownership stakes do not give them control over the company’s operations or assets. They only have the right to vote for directors, trade their shares and collect dividends.

You have 62.11% of this article left to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.

source site-30