The profile of Tom Trouillet, friend of Leslie and Kevin who was indicted for “kidnapping and forcible confinement” intrigues the girl’s relatives.
Tom Trouillet was arrested on February 28. The one who presents himself as a friend of Leslie and Kevin has since been indicted for “kidnapping and forcible confinement”. It intrigues Leslie’s parents, like the investigators, since the disappearance of the couple on the night of November 25 to 26. It was Tom Trouillet who was to host them after the blanquette evening spent at their friend’s house. It was Tom Trouillet who introduced Leslie and Kevin. He reportedly had feelings for Leslie and claims to have had a short history with her. A version of the facts that a friend of Leslie firmly denies in the columns of Figaro. “Tom was not immune to Leslie’s charms. But nothing ever happened between them, because he was not interested in him, it had annoyed Tom”, reports this friend. To his knowledge, there has never been anything more than a simple “friendly hug.” Tom and Leslie are also said to have shared a few passions, “trips in a converted truck as well as so that the dogs”, specifies Le Figaro.
After the disappearance of Leslie and Kevin, Tom has not ceased to be very active in the search for the couple. He even participated in the hunt organized to find them. A participation that takes on a whole new meaning today and that makes Leslie’s friend say that Tom’s behavior, very “invested” during the beat, is that of a “whack.” She wonders:He was showing the participants the direction to follow… Wasn’t he taking us away from the bodies?” For her, Tom’s behavior is similar to that of Jonathan Daval. She specifies: “He spoke in front of the journalists. He’s a boy of incredible composure, very cheeky.”
What’s next after this ad
Leslie and Kevin: two tracks studied
Nathan B. and Enzo C. have been indicted for “assassination”, “kidnapping and forcible confinement” And “modification of a crime scene”. During his March 7 press conference, Cyril Lacombe, the public prosecutor, explained that “the motivations for taking action remain to be confirmed”. The track of a “sentimental disappointment and/or financial debt” is, for the time being, the most probable.