Dare feminism! seizes the Prud’hommes against Miss France

Protest verbally, year after year, against a competition considered to be “Retrograde” and “Sexist” was no longer enough. This time, Dare feminism! take it to the next level. Accompanied by three plaintiffs (who prefer to remain anonymous), the universalist feminist organization is taking industrial action against Miss France. The request for referral, sent Friday, October 15 to CPH Bobigny, targets Endemol Productions, the company which organizes the competition and the program broadcast on TF1 each year, as well as the company Miss France as a co-employer. “We may protest every year against this competition which conveys sexist values, nothing ever changes, justifies Alyssa Ahrabare, the president of the association. As this awareness-raising effort was no longer sufficient, we decided to use the law to advance the cause of women. “ Grievances Dare feminism! are threefold: participation in the famous beauty contest would amount to delivering a work service; the regulations imposed by Miss France would include discriminatory clauses; Applying for the post of Miss France would amount to discrimination in hiring.

Read also The Miss France election dedicated to the cause of women, skeptical feminists

From the applicants’ point of view, the contractual relationship would begin with the signing of the form for participation in the preparation of shows at the local level, when the young women claim to win the election which will allow them to represent their region at the national level. From this stage, candidates must give of their time “Unrelated to private life” to lend themselves to rehearsals and performances which, in fine, will lead them to the realization of a “Economic value issue” – a “Show”. According to Violaine de Filippis-Abate, the lawyer of Dare feminism !, the working relationship between “Review leaders” (term used by Endemol), and the production company (an entity of the Banijay group, a French audiovisual production giant) should be all the less doubtful that a judgment of the Court of Cassation in 2013 concerning “Mister France” – a similar competition reserved for men – has already established it.

Another element tending to prove the link of subordination: candidates must comply with a certain number of obligations, including outside of rehearsals or recordings

Another element tending to prove the link of subordination: candidates must comply with a certain number of obligations, including outside rehearsals or recordings. Thus, they are ordered not to drink alcohol or consume illegal substances in public, and, in general, are asked to adopt a behavior that is not “Contrary to good morals, public order or the spirit of the competition based on the values ​​of elegance”. In the event of a breach, they run the risk of being disqualified.

You have 45.44% of this article to read. The rest is for subscribers only.

source site