Reserved for subscribers
Obviously, the queen doesn’t like her daughters-in-law. For her, the function of a royal wife is to ensure the continuity of the monarchy. Point.
By Marc Roche
Published on
– Modified
Link copied
Copy link
Lhe history of the long reign of Elizabeth II is strewn with “strangled” daughters-in-law. The queen showed no mercy towards Diana, Camilla, Fergie, even Sophie, respective wives of her three sons, Charles, Andrew and Edward. Obviously, the sovereign does not like her daughters-in-law. The monarch has always considered them as simple appendages of their husbands, a bit like add-ons of little interest. In the eyes of this traditional woman, the function of a royal wife is to provide an heir and a spare wheel in order to ensure the continuity of the monarchy. How to explain this attitude mixing indifference and contempt?
The queen prefers the company of men. Some see there the effect of an adolescence spent in the company of the stronger ex-sex. Elizabeth’s childhood…
Elizabeth II – The Last Queen
8,90€
We will probably never know the truth of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor. It doesn’t matter, in the end. From her posterity will remember the longest reign in history, spanning two centuries, ensuring a link between the generations who have always known this silent icon, a symbol of resilience, permanence and paradoxically of normality. For, under the golds and the pomp, behind the palaces, the brooches and the hats, everyone felt that Elizabeth Regina was a woman almost like the others, loving country life more than anything, her old scarves, her dogs and his family, even a little dysfunctional. Like everyone else, she faced ups and downs, joys and dramas, approaching the vicissitudes with exemplary self-control. Here then, beyond the majesty of the Crown, is the family album and the intimate portrait of an extraordinary woman.
Comment
You can no longer react to articles following the submission of contributions that do not comply with the moderation charter of Le Point.