Bruno Sulak was initially perceived as just a thief by the investigator overseeing his case, but his unique audacity and social awareness set him apart from typical criminals. The investigator shared insights into their complex relationship, characterized by mutual respect rather than friendship. While the film adaptation captures some elements of their interactions, it omits key details, including Sulak’s marital status. Ultimately, the case profoundly impacted the investigator’s career and perspective on freedom.
Unraveling the Enigma of Bruno Sulak
Who was Bruno Sulak to you?
Initially, he was merely a thief in my eyes. I was overseeing the Office of Banditry at the time. Following his escape from Albi, he embarked on a spree of supermarket robberies. It wasn’t until his third or fourth heist that we began to realize that the same individual was behind these crimes.
Insights and Intrigues: The Case of Sulak
What stood out to you the most during your investigation?
At first glance, there was nothing particularly remarkable about him, aside from his audacity. Despite being armed, he avoided violence, which helped us draw connections.
Security cameras were sparse back then, so we started tracing leads to identify him. Ultimately, our diligent efforts paid off, and we succeeded in apprehending him—thanks to our expertise!
Did you encounter other criminals with a similar profile during your career?
Honestly, no. Most robbers conform to a certain stereotype, but Sulak was different. He had a unique mindset and a social awareness that many lacked. While most criminals were reclusive, he maintained a vibrant social life under a false identity, engaging in activities like tennis and even obtaining a pilot’s license.
Was there a genuine bond between you and Bruno, as depicted in the film Libre?
Calling it friendship might be an exaggeration, but there was mutual respect, and we communicated effectively. I often felt like a big brother to him. We enjoyed our conversations, especially when he was outside. However, during his confinement, our exchanges took on a different tone…
What aspects of the film align with reality?
Bruno did arrange several meetings with me. The first time, I had my team in hiding, which made him reconsider. The second time, he hesitated to approach me, even though I was alone. Contrary to the film, the car scene never happened; our discussions occurred in a café.
What about the train scene?
I was not involved in that incident. They pulled the emergency signal, causing the train to stop. They exited onto the tracks and robbed the police to make their escape.
Were you involved in the scriptwriting process?
I had a conversation with Mélanie Laurent, during which she might have adjusted the script slightly based on our discussion. I also met Lucas Bravo, who was keen to understand the character. Yvan Attal approached me similarly…
However, I must say that the wig Yvan wore was slightly exaggerated! While I did have long hair at the time, it was a bit over the top. Yet, Yvan did capture the character’s subtle nuances effectively.
Did you meet Thalie, Sulak’s girlfriend, during your investigation?
Yes, at that time, she had a vibrant personality, much like the actress portraying her. She was a stunning woman who exuded happiness. Their love story was captivating, though Bruno was known to be a bit of a heartthrob. They weren’t exactly Bonnie and Clyde, but they were quite close.
The film leaves out the fact that he was married, right?
Yes, that detail is overlooked in the film. During his first robbery, he was accompanied by his brother-in-law, who was also his wife’s sibling.
Did the Sulak case change your perspective on your career?
Definitely. It prompted me to reflect on everything. One day, he brought up the concept of freedom, suggesting that I wasn’t truly free in my role. That conversation resonated with me deeply. After the case, a judge speculated that I might leave the police to pursue Sulak’s hidden fortune…
What happened to the stolen goods?
We never recovered any of it. He claimed he was wealthy, even saying he had billions—back when we were still using francs!
Did you leave the police after the Sulak affair?
While it wasn’t the sole reason, yes, this case left a significant mark on me. Our discussions impacted me profoundly, and I found it easier to communicate with him over the phone rather than face-to-face.
Was Bruno Sulak truly a literary figure, as the film implies?