Epic Games calls for Play Store reform after legal victory against Google







Photo credit © Reuters

by Mike Scarcella

(Reuters) – Epic Games, the publisher of the video game “Fortnite”, has asked a federal judge in California to force Google to open its application store, Play Store, more widely to competition under a ruling of justice against the undue monopoly exercised by the American technological giant.

Epic won a notable victory against Google last December in an anti-trust trial, which found illegal the search giant’s practices to establish a de facto monopoly in the Play App Store by, in particular, charging high fees to developers. applications. Corrective measures had been requested.

Epic sets out its expectations in a document filed Thursday with District Judge James Donato in San Francisco, the same one who presided over the trial against Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet.

Read alsoCounting

Epic Games is demanding that Google allow the distribution of third-party applications on the Play Store for six years and that the company’s ability to enter into agreements with device manufacturers to restrict the downloading of competing applications be limited.

The California judge is not required to grant Epic’s proposal, and it is likely that a new bitter fight will begin before an order is issued against Google.

This complaint nonetheless remains a new test for Google – like Apple which is engaged in separate legal proceedings – in the battle initiated by developers over the distribution of their applications and profits. that they get from it.

Representatives for Google and Epic did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Google defends its app store terms and denies wrongdoing. The company has until May 3 to respond to Epic’s proposal, which does not seek damages.

(Reporting Mike Scarcella in Washington and Mrinmay Dey in Bangalore; French version Alban Kacher)











Reuters

©2024 Thomson Reuters, all rights reserved. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Thomson Reuters or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. “Reuters” and the Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.



Source link -87