A 51-year-old widow demanded exactly 100,000 euros from her ex-boyfriend after their separation. According to the defendant, she would also be entitled to the sum: according to a so-called cohabitation agreement. A contract that is concluded between unmarried couples, especially in Switzerland. The woman had to answer for severe coercion and forgery of documents on Thursday at the Vienna Regional Criminal Court.
An unusual trial took place on Thursday at the Vienna Regional Court for Criminal Matters. A 51-year-old widow – who says she is wealthy and lives in Vienna and Como – had to answer for severe coercion and forgery of documents. After separating from her long-term boyfriend, she is said to have demanded financial compensation and the repayment of alleged loans and used threats and false documents. Wanted 100,000 euros after the relationship ended. The defendant vehemently rejected the allegations: “That’s an impudence. Beyond good and evil!” She claimed that she was entitled to exactly 100,000 euros after the relationship ended on the basis of a so-called cohabitation agreement, to the astonishment of judge Martina Semper. Such a contract is usually concluded between unmarried couples, especially in Switzerland. In the case of the defendant, however, according to her account, it came about when their relationship was already “in limbo,” as she admitted. “I researched what is usual for security,” she said, “so we wanted to save ourselves, that things have to be broken down into small particles.” She also repeatedly lent the ex-husband money, which she is now entitled to now that she is no longer with him: “He even disinvited me from his mother’s funeral. I was incredibly offended.”Wanted to “destroy” ex. The woman had been in a relationship with the person concerned, an asset manager who worked in London, for around ten years. In court she tried to explain in detail that the separation had been “incredibly complicated and convoluted”. However, it is clear to the prosecution that she backed up her financial claims against her ex by promising him the destruction of his economic existence. Among other things, she is said to have threatened in the summer of 2021 that she would report on his “missteps” and all sexual contacts in his life Make your circle of customers and acquaintances public. She is also said to have submitted a so-called consulting agreement, according to which she was entitled to 3,500 euros in English pounds per month for her services in his company. “I took training courses on how to conduct sales discussions.” She also “supported her ex with business psychology.” Dubious contract From the public prosecutor’s point of view, two points are irritating about the consulting contract: on the one hand, it was handwritten by the defendant, and on the other hand, it was supposed to be The man’s signature was a forgery. The hearing was postponed for the questioning of the asset manager. The defense attorney requested the involvement of a graphological expert to prove the authenticity of the disputed signatures.
source site-12