In-article:

Expansion at the expense of the environment – Energy supply: Council of States Commission calls for more speed – News


contents

The Federal Council’s draft for the revision of the Energy and Electricity Supply Act does not go far enough for the Commission. In her revision of the proposal, she goes much further – also at the expense of environmental protection.

To ensure that more domestic and renewable energy is produced in future, the Federal Council is proposing a comprehensive revision of the Energy Act and the Electricity Supply Act. By promoting water, wind and sun, he also wants to become more independent of fossil fuels and foreign countries.

This revision, the so-called blanket decree, is likely to shape Swiss energy policy in the years to come. On Thursday, the Council of States will discuss the Federal Council’s draft. However, this was revised again by the State Council Commission and now goes much further – at the expense of environmental protection. The most important answers.

What does the Federal Council’s revision proposal include? If the Federal Council has its way, there should be more money for large hydropower plants in the future. In addition, large photovoltaic systems should be easier to install in Switzerland. The goal is for the renewable energy sources wind and sun to supply 17 terawatt hours of electricity annually by 2035. In addition, large storage power plants should also get us safely through the winter.

What is the position of the competent committee of the Council of States on the Federal Council’s proposal? The competent commission of the Council of States thinks everything is still too small. She wants to go further with the revision of the energy and electricity supply law. And it demands a faster pace at the production target. By 2035, 35 terawatt hours per year should be produced with wind and sun, which would be more than double the Federal Council’s proposal. The Commission argues that Switzerland needs more electricity than previously calculated for future developments, for example for electromobility.

What should be discussed about the revised bill from the Commission? The revised bill by the Council of States Commission has its price: the more ambitious goals result in cutbacks in environmental protection. In the future, hydroelectric power plants will be allowed to continue producing electricity, even when water levels are low. And even in remote valleys, in biotopes of national importance, the ban on building electricity plants is to be lifted.

source site-72