Faeser does not prevail: EU countries agree on stricter asylum procedures

Faeser does not prevail
EU countries agree on stricter asylum procedures

At first it didn’t look like an agreement. Several EU interior ministers were dissatisfied with the proposed asylum compromise. In the evening, a sufficiently large majority finally comes together. Federal Minister of the Interior Faeser cannot get her proposal accepted.

The asylum procedures in the EU are to be significantly tightened in view of the problems with illegal migration. At a meeting of interior ministers in Luxembourg, a sufficiently large majority of member states voted in favor of comprehensive reform plans, as announced by the Swedish Presidency. In particular, they provide for a much more rigid approach to dealing with migrants with no prospects of staying.

In the future, people arriving from countries that are considered safe should come to strictly controlled reception facilities under conditions similar to detention after crossing the border. There, it would normally be checked within twelve weeks whether the applicant has a chance of asylum. If not, it should be sent back immediately.

In the negotiations, the federal government had emphatically advocated that families with children be exempted from the so-called border procedures. In order to make the breakthrough possible, however, she ultimately had to accept that this could be possible. However, Federal Minister of the Interior Nancy Faeser said at the meeting that the Federal Government will continue to work to ensure that all children’s rights are guaranteed.

Now it’s the EU Parliament’s turn

It is also conceivable that the EU Parliament will push through changes. It has a say in the reform and will negotiate the project with representatives of the EU states in the coming months.

In addition to the tightened asylum procedures, the approved plans also provide for more solidarity with the heavily burdened member states at the EU’s external borders. In the future, it should no longer be voluntary, but mandatory. Countries that do not want to take in refugees would be forced to pay compensation. Countries like Hungary therefore voted against the plan. Countries like Italy, for example, could benefit from the obligation to show solidarity. According to the UN refugee agency, more than 50,000 migrants who crossed the Mediterranean have been registered in Italy this year. Most of them came from Tunisia, Egypt and Bangladesh and therefore had almost no prospects of being able to stay legally.

The outstanding negotiations with the EU Parliament should ideally be concluded before the end of the year. Then the laws could be passed before the European elections in June 2024. If this does not succeed, the changed political balance of power could make renegotiations necessary.

source site-34