‘He might just be there’ grandfather’s theory during early hunts revealed

More than a month and a half after the disappearance of Emile, certain remarks of the members of his family during the hunts stand out. The little boy’s relatives have remained silent in the media since the start of the investigation.

It has been almost six weeks now that little Emile S, two and a half years old, disappeared without a trace in the hamlet of Haut-Vernet (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence). On July 8, 2023, while he was playing in front of his grandparents’ house, the little boy vanished following a moment of inattention from his loved ones. Seen a little further down the street by passers-by, he was never seen again afterwards. All theories are still possible at this stage of the investigation, according to the information provided by the instruction. In the village, rumors are rife, and many revolve around the atypical profile of the little boy’s family. The grandparents, the parents, the 9 uncles and aunts as well as the little sister of Emile are all still in the village, but have decided, on the advice of justice, not to break the silence in the media.

It is a rare word that reveals this Monday, August 21, 2023 our colleagues from Parisian. They relate the state of mind of Emile’s grandfather, Philippe V, during the very first drives. Often singled out, the fifty-year-old osteopath thought he would quickly find the little boy, who was often turbulent and adventurous. “Maybe he’s just there, under a clump of grass” he said then. Sure of himself, he had “not considered useful” to call on the cousins ​​of the family as of July 9, in order to help with the search. They were only called in as reinforcements the following day. A controversial decision. This July 10 marked one of the biggest days of the excavations, with no less than 600 volunteers mobilized to crisscross the area.

What’s next after this ad

“He knew from the start that we would not find him”

This choice not to call their relatives as reinforcements was seen differently by other witnesses. Already at the time, the authoritarian and sometimes quite nonchalant behavior of Emile’s family had shocked some volunteers. More than an assurance that the child would be found quickly, these words are interpreted very differently by some. A witness, present near relatives during the beating from July 8, tells the New Detective. “My impression is that he knew from the start that we would not find him…” Philippe V would have complained several times about the behavior of the little boy “It had to happen” he would have launched, adding that Emile is “hard to channel”, “stubborn” and lamenting that he “do as you please.”

If no major progress has yet been made in the case of Emile’s disappearance, the investigation is still ongoing. This Monday, August 21, she even passed a course. The instruction has just revealed that the legal framework of the investigation has evolved since July 28th. This went from a judicial investigation for worrying disappearance to an investigation for facts “kidnapping, arrest, detention, and arbitrary sequestration of a fifteen-year-old minor.“This change, announced by the public prosecutor of Aix-en-Provence, Jean-Luc Blachon, will in particular allow possible custody. This new status does not mean, however, that the track of the involvement of a third party is privileged. For the moment, no hypothesis has been ruled out.

Society/Sex/Psycho Journalist

source site-40