Immigration: Edouard Philippe wants to renegotiate the agreement with Algeria


The former Prime Minister spoke in “L’Express” on the migration issue and notably questioned a 55-year-old agreement with Algeria.





by IM with AFP

The former Prime Minister says he is “very supportive of the proposals made by Gérald Darmanin and Olivier Dussopt” on immigration.
© LUDOVIC MARIN / AFP

Premium Subscriber-only audio playback


Dince 1968, France and Algeria have had an agreement concerning migratory flows. The latter organizes the entry, stay and employment of Algerians in France, according to rules derogating from common law. On certain points, the Algerians are favored compared to other foreigners (in particular as regards family reunification), on others they are losers (in particular for the students). In an interview at The Expresspublished this Monday, June 5, Edouard Philippe questions this agreement, evokes a possible renegotiation and distills several positions against “immigration of the accomplished fact”, while the subject agitates the majority and the right.

This text “completely determines the law applicable to the entry and residence of Algerian nationals, with stipulations which are much more favorable than ordinary law. This is a very distinct feature. No national of another state enjoys such benefits,” said the former Prime Minister.

READ ALSO1968 immigration agreement: “Algerians laugh at our naivety”“Of course, there are extremely powerful historical relations between France and Algeria, but maintaining such a system today with a country with which we have complicated relations no longer seems justified to me”, continues Edouard. Philip.

In this interview, the president of Horizons evokes a “fait accompli immigration” in France, with “a very strong acceleration in the increase in the number of foreigners” since the beginning of the 2000s. And “the geographical origin of foreigners , too, has changed”, with a greater proportion of foreigners coming from North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa.

“During this period, the French population increased by 9% and the number of foreigners increased by 53%. And nothing in this development corresponds to a political choice or to a decision that we would have taken, ”continues the mayor of Le Havre.

Integration, Islam and Work

Edouard Philippe tackles “three things left unsaid” in terms of immigration: “first, we say that we want fewer foreigners in France, but when a certain number of our fellow citizens say so, they aim reality of people who have been French, sometimes for three generations. Controlling the entry of foreigners into France will not solve this problem. It is a subject of integration, education, civic-mindedness”. “The second unsaid concerns Islam”, which has become “a central subject, a worrying subject, an obsessive subject”.

“Finally, there is the unspoken work. Many French people find that there are too many foreigners in France, but in Parisian restaurants, in the tourist industry, in the agricultural sector, in a whole series of economic sectors which are not in crisis and which are essential to French success, we rely on a quite impressive number of foreigners”, develops Edouard Philippe.

READ ALSO“Immigration is not at the heart of people’s demands”The former Prime Minister says he is “very supportive of the proposals made by Gérald Darmanin and Olivier Dussopt”, while the executive is looking for ways to a parliamentary majority with LR on the immigration side. “This law is necessary, but I know that it is not sufficient”, he nevertheless specifies.

He says he is “opposed to any massive regularization and favorable to the principle proposed by Olivier Dussopt: to allow people exercising professional activities in sectors where the national interest requires to be able to continue to do so. I would prefer that this regularization be done on a case-by-case basis”.

Edouard Philippe says he understands “the objective pursued by LR”, who wants to modify the Constitution in order to be able to derogate from European and international law, but “this proposal is not satisfactory in its terms. It would be interpreted for what it is, that is to say a form of legal Frexit”.




Source link -82