Immigration law: “End of the road”, “Darmanin resignation”, reactions after the vote on the motion to reject


Romain Rouillard and Alexis Delafontaine with AFP / Photo credit: Ludovic MARIN / AFP
modified to

9:42 a.m., December 12, 2023

There will be no debate in the Assembly around the immigration bill. This Monday, the deputies adopted, by a narrow majority (270 votes against 265), the rejection motion, tabled by the environmentalists, thus inflicting a very heavy political defeat on the government. The Republicans and the National Rally, who held part of the destiny of this text in their hands, finally decided to support this motion after long hours of suspense. The text can now be sent back to the Senate or to a joint committee, where seven senators and seven deputies sit. The right would be in the majority and would then have every opportunity to impose its conditions. Unless the executive decides to simply withdraw its text.

On the right, as on the left, we welcome this snub inflicted on Gérald Darmanin, Minister of the Interior and leader of the project. On and therefore for him.

“It is time to work on a bill consistent with republican principles,” added the boss of the PS, Olivier Faure, who emphasizes that “foreigners cannot be presented as suspects” and that Emmanuel Macron was elected “ to be a dam to the RN”. “We rejected Gérald Darmanin’s immigration bill! We refuse this dangerous, racist, xenophobic and useless law for our country”, rejoices, on X, the LFI deputy Ugo Bernalicis,

Republicans demand adoption of Senate text

On the other side of the political spectrum, Marine Le Pen sees in the adoption of this rejection motion “an extremely powerful disavowal” for the executive, while the RN deputy Laure Lavalette, through a simple “Darmanin resignation”, calls on the tenant of Place Beauvau to leave its functions.

“We felt that there was something to be done with Les Républicains,” confides a close friend of Marine Le Pen. Marine Le Pen’s party did not hesitate to join the other parties to enable the rejection motion to succeed. “I think the snub is stronger. A Minister of the Interior who cannot get his text on immigration across, I think that puts an end to the greater ambitions he had,” continues Laure Lavalette.

Until the last moment, several RN executives lied to the government, suggesting that they were going to vote against this motion. And their plan was supported by the Republicans who wanted to make Gérald Darmanin pay for “his contempt”.

Eric Ciotti, boss of the LR, is now demanding that the toughened version of the bill be debated and then adopted, “in its entirety, without additions, without modifications”, after its passage in the Senate. A “firm” text that “your government allowed to be trampled in committee”, also attacked the head of the LR group in the Assembly, Olivier Marleix.

On BFMTV, Renaissance MP Maud Bregeon, for her part, evokes “a problem of coherence” in the ranks of the National Assembly and denounces the obstruction of the Republicans. “Everything that the Republicans have proposed for many years, we have proposed to do with them (…) and Mr. Ciotti preferred to vote for censure with Madame (Sandrine) Rousseau. Where is the consistency? What will- will they explain to their voters when they return to their constituency?” she asked.





Source link -74