In the United Kingdom, the Supreme Court confirms the illegality of deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda

The British Supreme Court confirmed on Wednesday, November 15, the illegality of the government’s highly controversial plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda, wherever they come from, who arrived illegally on British soil. The senior magistrates thus rejected the appeal from Rishi Sunak’s government and upheld the decision of the court of appeal which concluded that Rwanda could not be considered a safe third country.

“We challenge the decision that Rwanda is not a safe third country for asylum seekers and refugees”declared Yolande Makolo, spokesperson for the Rwandan government, after the decision was delivered and after months of controversy and legal battle.

The project is a flagship measure by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who succeeded Boris Johnson a year ago, as part of his promise to“stop the boats” and fight against illegal immigration. Immigration was at the heart of the Brexit referendum debate in 2016 and will likely be a major issue ahead of next year’s elections, in which Labor is favored.

Read also: Article reserved for our subscribers UK Court of Appeal rules sending asylum seekers to Rwanda illegal

An expulsion in exchange for 160 million euros

Signed in April 2022 under the conservative government of Boris Johnson, the “migratory and economic development partnership” provides a one-way ticket to Rwanda for migrants arriving illegally on British soil, regardless of their origin. This agreement, which runs for a period of five years, provides for London to pay Kigali 140 million pounds sterling (160 million euros), a sum allocated to development aid and the care of migrants. expelled, with the idea that they would settle in the African country.

Boris Johnson’s government at the time insisted on the need to find new solutions due to the failure of the British asylum system to cope with the increase in immigration. London was banking on this solution to deter migrants who cross the Channel aboard small inflatable boats.

Read also: Article reserved for our subscribers British government sees first asylum flight to Rwanda canceled due to lack of passengers

Boris Johnson’s supporters welcomed this project, believing that it was a solution to deal with the phenomenon of “small boats” and alleviate the pressure induced by the number of asylum seekers. Some 45,000 people made the crossing in 2022. Opponents consider the project contrary to international law and accuse it of being impossible to implement, immoral, complicated and expensive.

No migrants have yet been expelled. The first were ready to take off for Rwanda in June 2022, but the European Court of Human Rights intervened and suspended the implementation of the project pending a decision on the merits.

The London High Court first ruled on the legal project in December 2022, then in June, the Court of Appeal overturned the first instance judgment, finding that Rwanda is not a safe third country and citing the “failures” of its asylum system. She ruled that the migrants were at risk of expulsion from Rwanda to their country of origin where they would risk persecution, which contravenes Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights on torture. and inhumane treatment.

The World with AFP

source site-29