Japan: BoJ policy has created strong tensions on the bond market







Photo credit © Reuters

by Leika Kihara

TOKYO (Reuters) – The Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) massive asset purchase program implemented in 2013 led to a sharp deterioration in the functioning of the bond market, a phenomenon which worsened after the implementation of the yield curve control (YCC) policy, a central bank survey of market operators showed on Friday.

The results of this survey highlight that the central bank’s ultra-accommodative monetary policy has had an impact on market liquidity in the world’s third largest economy, which could weigh on its future decisions in the event of a change of direction with the abandonment expected negative rates next year.

The survey was carried out as part of an in-depth review of the impact on the economy and financial markets of the BoJ’s 25-year unconventional monetary easing policy.

The transmission index, measuring how market participants perceive the functioning of the bond segment, deteriorated sharply, falling to 5 points after the BoJ adopted quantitative and qualitative easing (QQE) in April 2013, while it was at 62 points before this measurement, specifies the survey.

After the implementation of negative interest rates in January 2016 in Japan, the index further deteriorated to -48 points, before plunging to -71 after the adoption of the yield curve control system which limits the fluctuation of Japanese bonds to ten years, we can read in the survey.

Former BoJ Governor Haruhiko Kuroda implemented QQE in April 2013, in order to cause a jolt and bring the Japanese out of deflationary lethargy by printing money, so that inflation rises towards the bank’s 2% objective.

With inflation now exceeding 2% for more than a year, many market participants expect current BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda to end this massive monetary support program next year.

(Reporting Leika Kihara; French version Claude Chendjou, edited by Blandine Hénault)











Reuters

©2023 Thomson Reuters, all rights reserved. Reuters content is the intellectual property of Thomson Reuters or its third party content providers. Any copying, republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. “Reuters” and the Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies.



Source link -87