Jihadist propaganda: 10 years in prison required in the trial of Saber Lahmar, ex of Guantanamo


The anti-terrorism prosecutor requested Friday, May 13 the maximum sentence, ten years in prison, against Saber Lahmar, cleared of Guantanamo and tried in Paris for having incited several people to leave for Iraq or Syria.

With regard to this 52-year-old Algerian, she requested a two-thirds security period as well as a “permanent ban from the national territory“. Called by many devotees “the sheikh“, having studied Islam in Medina, Saudi Arabia, Saber Lahmar, who officiated as an imam in the first half of the 2010s in the Bordeaux region, said according to the magistrate “used his knowledge to promote the departure of a family with young children and an individual in the area, one of whom died there“.

“No ounce of questioning on anything”

He favored the departure of individuals who fought, also causing the death of other people on the spot.“said the counterterrorism prosecutor. Seven departures are attributed to him, by the courts but also by relatives of the starters: Othman Yekhlef is considered to be “dead on areasince the end of 2015, while Salim Machou, who left with his wife and four children, was sentenced to death in 2019 by the Iraqi courts for his membership in the Islamic State group.

According to the prosecutor of the anti-terrorism prosecution,there are undoubtedly in Saber Lahmar the consequences of what he lived“, eight years of detention and “torturein the sinister military prison of Guantanamo, on an American naval base on the island of Cuba, from which he emerged cleared by American justice before being welcomed by France. But the defendant, who challenged the procedure and the charges during the four days of hearings, did not, according to her, “no ounce of questioning about anything“. Regarding the other defendant, Mohamed H., considered the “secondof Saber Lahmar, the prosecutor requested six years of imprisonment, without a security period but with a warrant of deposit with deferred effect.

The defendant, speechless during the pronouncement of the required sentence, was, according to the prosecutor, neither the “blind witness» of these departures, nor «the unfortunate actor of the file“. For her, Mohamed H. “knew the project» from the zone and favored it. The defendant admitted for the first time during the hearing his “radicalization“passed but had disputed everything”supportto the Islamic State organization and any involvement in the departures. “As long as he has not done this work on himself, he is likely to reoffend“, according to her. The 16th chamber of the Paris Criminal Court should reserve its decision for June.



Source link -94