Since June 2021, Cédric Jubillar has been in pre-trial detention for spousal homicide. He is indeed for justice the number 1 suspect in the disappearance of his wife Delphine, which took place on the night of December 15 to 16, 2020. For the authorities, the clues overwhelm the painter-plasterer who was in the process of divorcing the mother of his two children, Louis and Elyah. In his psychological report, the detainee from Seysses prison near Toulouse affirms his version and believes that the gendarmes have disguised the truth.
Since day one, Cédric Jubillar has claimed his innocence. Through his lawyers who say the case against him is empty, but also through his voice. Indeed, his confidences during his psychological expertise were revealed by The Parisian. They reveal the explanations given by the controversial Tarn craftsman on the evidence which tends to show that he could be involved in the murder of his wife.
This is how he argued that the investigation would be rigged: “The gendarmes covered up the evidence: the blood on the pajamas, the car moved, lots of little things like that.“On July 6, 2021, The world had revealed that traces of sperm had been found on Cédric’s pajamas. But for the lawyers of the 34-year-old painter-plasterer, this task would only be a “microtrace of blood on the sleeve mixed with semen, which would correspond more to a sexual intercourse than to a crime“.
As for the moved car, Cédric Jubillar refers to the statements of his neighbors. The latter claimed that the vehicle always parked in the same direction by Delphine had strangely been stored in the opposite direction on the morning of her disappearance. What to think that the controversial man would have used the vehicle during the fatal night. What had rebounded the defense of the accused: “the report of the gendarmes on the position of the vehicle was made in the middle of the day after the disappearance which does not allow to affirm that it was ‘hood down’ in the early morning“However, when the car was parked facing downhill, according to neighbors, that was when Cedric Jubillar drove it.
In this case without a crime scene and without a body, everyone’s word comes before that of the others. Concrete evidence is lacking – there is, however, such as the missing glasses’ broken glasses – and both parties know this very well. For the defense, it is proof that the accusations are unfounded, for the prosecution, his behavior says enough about the role he was able to play. Provocative, seeming little affected by the brutal and unexplained absence of the mother of his children, and aware that she had a lover, he has everything the ideal culprit. After a year and a half of investigation, the doubt remains.
Cédric Jubillar remains presumed innocent of the charges against him until the final judgment of this case.