“Let’s decide quickly” on the method to reform pensions, launched Édouard Philippe on Saturday, invited, like the secretary general of Renaissance Stéphane Séjourné, by François Bayrou to the summer universities of the MoDem where the three allies competed in kindness.
The hypothesis of a pension reform via an amendment to the social security financing bill, mentioned by Emmanuel Macron, divides the majority. Franois Bayrou warned against a forced passage and the MoDem deputies let it be known that they would certainly vote against such an amendment.
Franois (Bayrou) said very clearly, it’s perfectly respectable, and what’s more, it’s based on an often fair analysis, his position. I said with the same concern as Franois to achieve reform, and the same reading of the difficulties he pointed out, that whatever happens, we would firmly support the government. But let’s decide quickly, said douard Philippe.
Let’s not let this subject, this hesitation, wander. Let’s decide quickly and let’s either move quickly or move a little slower, but let’s say how we’re going to do it, we don’t need to add hesitation to a subject that is already complicated, it seems to me. , added the former Prime Minister.
Emmanuel Macron will meet next week with Elisabeth Borne the leaders of the majority and the ministers concerned to take stock of the way to initiate the pension reform, announced on Saturday the entourage of the head of state.
We all know the landing spot. We have the right to have discussions on how we are going, that does not bother me, and these debates are rather healthy in the majority, for his part declared the secretary general of the presidential party Renaissance, Stphane Sjourn.
Invest in the Scholarship at the best price ! 7 offers compared
If we want it to last, we have to know how to make this collective live with its different sensibilities, and I will also be the guarantor in the place that is mine, he added.
The alliance, for his part declared Franois Bayrou, presupposed reciprocal esteem, a sense of solidarity and freedom of expression.
It can happen that there are nuances between movements. It is very important that the French measure the duty of freedom which is ours, that of each of the formations of the majority. But these nuances in no way affect the necessary solidarity for me. Simply, it is for the French a guarantee of authenticity, according to the boss of the Modem.