LFI will file a motion of censure in reaction to the 3rd 49-3, says Coquerel

LFI will table a motion of censure in reaction to the third 49-3 triggered Wednesday by the government on the Social Security budget, announced Thursday the chairman of the Finance Committee of the Assembly Eric Coquerel.

Yes, we will do it, in any case on the rebellious side, because we must not trivialize the 49-3, explained Mr. Coquerel, asked about the filing of a new motion of censure on the set of France2.

He criticized something quite unique in democracies: a 49.3 means the National Assembly does not vote on the budget.

Late Wednesday, Elisabeth Borne triggered this article of the Constitution allowing the adoption of a text without a vote except for a motion of censure on the entire text of the social security budget. This is the third time in less than a week that she is holding her government accountable.

We take all those who want to join this motion of censure, has also slipped ric Coquerel.

The participation of the RN in the vote of the first motion of censure tabled by the Nupes had created unease in the ranks of the left and provoked criticism from the right and the majority, who denounced a collusion between the RN and the Nupes.

The deputy of Seine-Saint-Denis pointed out that the motion of the RN had collected only 90 votes, against the 239 harvested by that of Nupes. Who is capable of bringing down the government is Nupes, not Mme Le Pen, he concluded.

The Nupes had refused to vote for the motion of the RN.

Mr. Coquerel said he was ready, however, to vote on a motion tabled by the LR deputies. They are part of the Republican arc and it is not the same thing to vote for a group which is very much in the minority than for an extreme right-wing group.

Nobanques: the cheapest offers to control your budget

Within the Nupes, environmentalists have already announced that they would not file a new motion of censure.

For his part, the socialist deputy Arthur Delaporte, spokesman for the group in the Assembly, indicated that all this is still under discussion with all the partners, but this stage (a new motion of censure) is not necessarily the greater of the probabilities.

Should we again say that we do not agree when the message has passed, it is not necessarily obvious, he underlined, specifying that we do not want to do it.

But this does not mean that we refrain from doing so on subsequent readings of the same Social Security financing bill, he added.

source site-96