Culture news “It was disappointing” James Cameron really didn’t like this Dune film made 40 years ago: he prefers Denis Villeneuve’s saga
James Cameron looks back on the adaptation of Dune from the 80s. It was disappointing according to him, because it was not as well done as that of Denis Villeneuve. The director shares his feelings about the adaptations of Frank Herbert’s work.
Polarized adaptations
When talking about the Dune films, it is commonly assumed that we are referring to Denis Villeneuve’s acclaimed 2021 film and its recent sequel, Dune: Part Two. However, there was a first adaptation in 1984, directed and written by David Lynch. This version was not a box office success and Lynch himself distanced himself from the project, even attempting to remove his name from the credits.
Despite this, the film has its admirers and is considered a cult classic. James Cameron, known for his work on Terminator, Aliens and obviously the Avatar saga, recently expressed his disapproval of Lynch’s version in an interview with “Le Figaro”:
David Lynch’s adaptation was disappointing. It lacked the power of Herbert’s novel. Villeneuve’s films are much more convincing. The characters are sketched and they are very identifiable. It’s real cinema. I speak regularly with Denis, from filmmaker to filmmaker. We record our conversations, like Truffaut and Hitchcock.
We understand here that the director of Titanic wants adaptations that pay homage to the original work. What he preferred in Villeneuve’s film was the adaptation, which was much more convincing than that of David Lynch. That said, this difference is undoubtedly explained by the difference in budget between the two films. It’s difficult to visually create a universe like Dune, without today’s special effects or insane amounts of money.
Try Amazon Prime free for 30 days
And yet…
Villeneuve is currently working on the third Dune film, the release year of which has not yet been confirmed. Some of course agree with James Camero and think that Denis Villeneuve’s film is objectively better and are waiting for this famous third part. But some, perhaps fewer in number, still think that David Lynch’s film had something interesting and special, like a kind of unique aura worthy of its time.
This page contains affiliate links to certain products that JV has selected for you. Each purchase you make by clicking on one of these links will not cost you more, but the e-merchant will pay us a commission. The prices indicated in the article are those offered by the merchant sites at the time of publication of the article and these prices are likely to vary at the sole discretion of the merchant site without JV being informed.
Learn more.