November 13: Abdeslam’s medical second opinion ordered, hearing postponed to Tuesday


After Salah Abdeslam tested positive for Covid-19 at the end of December, the trial was suspended. The different parties request that the hearing be resumed only when the accused is negative.

The trial of the November 13 attacks, which had been suspended Tuesday due to the state of health of Salah Abdeslam, was again postponed until January 11, pending a medical second opinion from the main accused , still positive for Covid-19. The Special Assize Court of Paris decided Thursday, January 6 to grant a request for a medical second opinion demanded by the lawyers of Salah Abdeslam, who had been declared “apt»To appear by a first doctor, a request in which defense lawyers and civil parties have joined.

After three hours of suspension, the president ordered this new expertise to determine whether Salah Abdeslam was “apt“To appear and indicate”any sanitary measure” necessary. He also asked “any useful details on the contagiousness of an unvaccinated inmate still positive after the 10-day isolation period“. The report is due on Monday, and the hearing will resume Tuesday at 12:30 p.m., he finally announced. The 32-year-old Frenchman, the only surviving member of the jihadist commandos who killed 130 people in Paris and Saint-Denis on November 13, 2015, was present in the box for the first time since November 25.

SEE ALSO – “Salah Abdeslam coughed on demand”: the November 13 trial postponed, a new medical expertise ordered

“The expert says everything and its opposite”

Salah Abdeslam had tested positive for Covid-19 on December 27, during the 15-day suspension of the hearing. The trial resumed briefly on Tuesday, before being immediately suspended, the main accused still being placed in solitary confinement after his positive test. Two medical expertises have confirmed in recent days that he was now able to attend the hearings. This, “subject to a negative test“, However specified the first expert report, dated Monday. The second, dated Wednesday, indicated that Salah Abdeslam was positive for Covid “at a very low level” and “his state of health allows him to appear at the hearing“.

Forty-eight hours apart, the expert says everything and its opposite. It discredits him from a medical and scientific point of view.“, One of the lawyers of Salah Abdeslam, Me Martin Vettes, was carried away at the hearing, asking for a further postponement of the hearing time to carry out a second opinion. Many lawyers, on the benches of the defense and the civil parties, have associated themselves with this request, demanding that the negative PCR test be “a compass“, In particular to avoid contamination”Cascade»In the box where the accused are seated within a meter of each other.

At the end of nearly four months of hearings marked by the hearings of survivors of the attacks and their relatives, the trial was due to enter a new phase this week, that of the interrogation on the merits of the case of the 14 defendants present (six others, therefore five presumed dead, are tried in their absence).


SEE ALSO – At the November 13 trial, defendants, including Abdeslam, refuse to attend the hearing



Source link -94