Prince Harry makes controversy by wanting to pay for his police protection in the United Kingdom


SHOCKING – The Duke of Sussex is threatening to take the UK government to court over the right to fund his police protection. An essential condition, according to him, to visit his country in complete safety in the company of his wife Meghan and their children Archie and Lilibet.

The date has been ticked in the calendar for months. But will Harry and Meghan take part next June in the festivities of the platinum jubilee of Elizabeth II, who celebrates her 70 years of reign? If the prince returned to his British lands in April for the funeral of his grandfather Philip, his wife and their eldest son Archie have not set foot in England since their sensational departure two years ago. Their seven-month-old daughter Lilibet has never left California. And has yet to be introduced to her very royal family. A meeting that should wait a little longer for security reasons.

He remains willing to cover security costs, so as not to impose it on British taxpayers– A spokesperson for Prince Harry

the DailyMail revealed this Sunday that Prince Harry had launched the beginnings of a legal action to be able to benefit from police protection which he would finance himself when he goes to the United Kingdom. A statement from a representative for the couple says that “the duke first offered to fund personally” such a system from January 2020. “The offer was rejected. He remains willing to cover the security costs, not to impose it on the British taxpayers”, clarifies the text.

By renouncing their active role within the royal family, the Sussexes have lost all of their titles but above all this close protection provided by overtrained officers of the Metropolitan Police – which depends on the British Interior Ministry and has access information from the secret services. “Others have left public office and are still receiving protection at no cost to them. Prince Harry’s goal is simple: to keep his family safe in the UK so his children can learn about his homeland. “, the statement added.

“Neo-Nazi and extremist” threats

Is cited as an example the last visit of Prince Harry, in July for the inauguration of the statue of his mother Diana. The queen’s grandson was notably followed by the paparazzi after a charity event. “His safety was compromised due to the lack of police protection”, insists the text.

Launched in September, the legal action could soon end up before the High Court of Justice in London. Citing “neo-Nazi and extremist threats”, the Duke of Sussex insists that he and his family “are incapable” to return to the UK until they are reassigned police protection. “The personal risk is too great”, asserts its press release. Something to make the British react.

Some already see it as the perfect excuse not to attend the Jubilee this summer. Others get annoyed in the pages of the tabloids. Starting with Piers Morgan, who qualified in The Sun the Duke of Sussex“a shameless hypocrite, deluded, who thinks he has all the rights”. Not surprising when you know that the journalist, ousted from his own show after comments on Meghan, does not carry the Sussexes in his heart.

Police protection should not be for sale– Ken Wharfe, Lady Di’s former personal bodyguard from 1987 to 1993

“Police protection should not be for sale”, writes for his part Ken Wharfe, former personal bodyguard of Lady Di from 1987 to 1993. “It is unthinkable that the Queen and her government would respond favorably to this request and set a precedent (…) Every Hollywood star or wealthy visiting celebrity could then expect the same privileges”, he believes in the DailyMail. And then there are those who support Harry by digging up the archives.

Read also

Journalist Omid Scobie, author of the unauthorized biography Finding Freedom in which Meghan admitted to having taken part, published on Twitter an article of the Guardian 20 years old. We learned that Prince Charles paid out of his own pocket two security guards to track his companion Camilla Parker-Bowles, before she officially became his wife three years later. The palace then spoke of a “private matter”. Neither Buckingham nor the government has commented on the new Harry case, which has overshadowed in the press across the Channel Prince Andrew’s legal troubles in the United States where he could be tried for rape. Two trials for the royal family in 2022? This would be totally unprecedented in the history of the Windsors.

On the same subject

The most read articles

Death of Gaspard Ulliel: what we know about the circumstances of the ski accident

Disappearance of Gaspard Ulliel: who is his companion Gaëlle Pietri, mother of their son Orso?

LIVE – Covid-19: to “give visibility”, a Health Defense Council scheduled for Thursday

Teachers’ strike: what to expect for this Thursday’s demonstration?

Morocco: the anti-terrorist prosecutor’s office opens an investigation after the “assassination” of a French tourist

defends the ambition of information
free,
verified and accessible to all thanks to the income of the
advertising .

To help us keep this service free you can “change your choice” and accept all cookies.





Source link -81