Single Bull Review – Much average, two assets

After 43 games in a row with scoring in front of their own crowd, the Bulls were unable to score for the first time. Two people from Salzburg stood out from the otherwise average collective.

Köhn: 3Was completely unemployed apart from one shot. Staged his offensive series with a few good discounts.Kristensen: 3Few of the offensive actions typical for him. Lots of ideas, there was a lack of execution. Scored the only goal disallowed. Safe at the back.Onguéné: 3 Defensive never required. The opponent was simply too weak for that. Got a “gherkin” from Mustapha. Otherwise safe. A free kick attempt went just over it. Ulmer: 3 Much too imprecise in the first half. After the break with some good passes, in the end he gave the template for a shot on goal five times.Camara: 4The “Pitbull” really had everything under control in midfield. Missed to crown his good performance in the second half with a goal.Seiwald: 3The endurance runner didn’t let anything go. Forward it was too imprecise.Aaronson: 4 Very hard. Was the bull who gave the most offensive accents. Missed a thousand percent and a hundred percent chance. The target water was missing in the drinking bottle. Sucic: 2Too many flourishes, often just too casual. Hardly ever showed what it was actually made of. Must improve with regard to Lille.Adeyemi: 2Could too seldom cause problems for the defensive wall of Admira. He lacked the ultimate consequence and concentration.Okafor: 3The Swiss man was invisible except for one good try. Had problems with the closely staggered defensive rows of the Lower Austrians. Substituted for Adamu at the break. Adamu: 3Caused danger in one-on-one duels, unlike Okafor. In the end, he was unlucky, but was rarely put in the limelight by his colleagues.Sesko, Bernardo: 0
source site-12