Stade de France: a report underlines a “disproportionate” police reaction



PAlmost two weeks after the incidents that occurred on the sidelines of the Champions League final at the Stade de France (Saint-Denis), a first government investigation report was submitted to the Prime Minister on Friday June 10, and it is overwhelming. The document concludes with a series of “failures” and deplores a police response to incidents that have caused “serious damage to the image of France”. The report highlights “highly publicized scenes of law and order operations […] which have raised questions from outside observers about our country’s ability to deliver and succeed in the major sporting events for which we will soon be responsible”.

This document punctuates a week of twists and turns about the chaos that reigned around the Stade de France on Saturday May 28. While the prefect of police Didier Lallement explained himself to the Senate on Thursday, the information that certain CCTV images have been erased has since been controversial. These are images of the Stade de France and not of the police.

READ ALSOChampions League: investigation into the failures of the Stade de France

The government report first addresses the question of the security system around the enclosure, reinforced, but quickly outdated. Nearly 1,680 security guards were mobilized by the French Football Federation (FFF) for the Real Madrid-Liverpool Champions League final, “i.e. + 17% compared to the Coupe de France final”. On the police side, 6,800 police officers, gendarmes and firefighters have also been deployed, including 1,300 at the Stade de France.

Near the stadium, the pre-filtering points were “configured as usual, with 10 palpation lines and 41 agents able to correctly process a flow of 10,000 people”, from the RER D. But these were loaded a “double filter”: inspect the supporters, their clothes, their bags, and control “the validity of the tickets either by chemical pens or by electronic cards”. A system already successfully tested for the final of the Coupe de France, “but with only electronic tickets and a low risk of counterfeit tickets”.

On May 28, he quickly proved ineffective against the massive influx of supporters. The strike movement on the RER B had in fact led to the transfer of a very large number of travelers to the RER D, which created blockages “between the exits of transport and the pre-filtering points”, in particular for lack of appropriate signage, notes Michel Cadot.

An “unprecedented” fraud at the ticket office

According to the DGIES, “the main trigger is the massification of a crowd of spectators in the public space at the pre-screening points, spectators of whom a significant proportion were without tickets or provided with counterfeit tickets”. . However, the figure of 35,000 people without valid tickets around the stadium (advanced by Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin) is “to be put into perspective”, because it corresponds “to the deduction between the total volume of people who arrived by all means up to ‘at the Stade de France and the number of spectators counted in the stadium’.

According to a first count, 2,589 unknown tickets were identified by the operator Orange. Three banknotes were specifically duplicated hundreds of times, “with good visual forgery quality, on a cardboard backing,” according to the document.

A “disproportionate” police reaction

The blockages observed at the pre-filtering were reproduced at the level of the entrance tripods, “preventing people in possession of valid tickets from being able to enter the stadium”, he describes. At 6:30 p.m., faced with a large influx from the RER D, the choice was made to open the dam, to avoid “crushing phenomena” and “a very serious human toll, which would have led to the cancellation of the match “.

The breach of the security perimeter then allows the intrusion of “delinquents in the device” then “the occupation of the southern part around the stadium by several thousand people without tickets or with counterfeit tickets”. Many thefts with violence are then noted by the police.

The invasion of the forecourt of the Stade de France then “required the use of hand gas canisters and tear gas canisters to restore order and oppose attempts to enter by force” by Liverpool supporters and “thugs” , justifies the report.

READ ALSOKahn – What do the reactions to a politico-sports megafiasco reveal?

“Disproportionate” means, regretted by the prefect of police, Didier Lallement. The repositioning of part of the forces inside the stadium on the south side to contain intrusion attempts “contributed to leaving the pitch to the offenders”, before “calm was partially restored at half-time of the match , episodes continuing throughout the evening and until the spectators left at the end of the match”.

Still a hope to recover the images

The police, responsible for investigating counterfeit tickets during the Champions League final, asked the Stade de France on Thursday evening for images of the violence filmed by its cameras, shortly after the announcement in the Senate that they had been destroyed, we learned Friday from a source familiar with the matter. Source who said he “still hopes” to recover them, without further details. Thursday evening’s information “according to which these images would not be kept for one month, the maximum authorized legal duration, but only a few days – information that we did not know – led us to request them all the same”, explained the Bobigny prosecution. .

For the delegate president of the LREM group at the Assembly Aurore Bergé, “we have enough elements which allow us to have an investigation”, in particular images “shot multiple times, and by journalists, and by supporters” . “The images, you have them, they exist, and we have a lot of testimonies and images” which should “allow all the same to enlighten” the investigators, she estimated on RMC. Asked whether she nevertheless regretted the disappearance of some of them, Aurore Bergé argued that it was up to the police and the justice system “that we will have to ask the question”.

Why did Gérald Darmanin then, from the days following the incidents, reject the responsibility on the English supporters? He then “acknowledged the different responsibilities” during his hearing before the Senate, argued the MP about the minister’s mea culpa.




Source link -82