The controversy over the transfer of the collection of contributions to the Agirc-Arrco supplementary pension scheme is a fantasy, said Thursday the director of Urssaf, Yann-Gal Amghar, assuring that this reform will save nearly 700 million euros per year.
The Urssaf counter-attacks: after the barrage by Agirc-Arrco worried about a capture of its resources, then the diatribe of parliamentarians accusing the State of helping themselves to the coffers, and finally the cancellation of the measure voted by the Senate within the framework of the social security budget, Mr. Amghar denounced during a press conference the untruths of the opponents of this project.
Acted at the end of 2019, this massive transfer of contributions (more than 87 billion euros this year, taken from 25 million private sector employees and paid 13 million in withdrawals) could come into force in 2024 if the version adopted by the Assembly – via 49.3 – is reinstated at second reading next week.
Retirement Agirc-Arrco: this controversial transfer which risks parasitizing the pension reform
Simplify business life
Many things are fantasy or disinformation, said the director of Urssaf, assuring that his network – which manages the cash flow of the Scu – will not have the right to touch the reserves of the great plan of private sector employees. and that there is no risk of doing less well in the calculation of pensions.
The objective is, on the contrary, to simplify the life of companies, which will have only one contact for their contributions, while generating a gain for public finances of at least 680 million euros (400 million reduction in unpaid bills, 280 million in control yield), not to mention the elimination of at least 600 duplicate jobs.
Find the lowest rate for your real estate project!
It is a mastered project, the risk of industrial accident is absolutely not proven, assured the president of Urssaf, Thibault Lanxade, however member of a Medef hostile to this reform. The tensions that have arisen on the home stretch may be linked to the debate on pension reform, he suggested, underlining the legitimate concern of the social partners to ensure that the system is maintained.
Reproduction forbidden.