“A transpartisan amendment for true transparency”, justified the communist senator Eliane Assassi. The measure will certainly not be retained by the government.
The Senate relaunched the debate on the transparency of consulting firms overnight from Monday to Tuesday with the adoption of an amendment “transpartisanto the 2023 draft budget after the opening of two investigations by the courts. This text, approved by a show of hands, reproduces the bill adopted unanimously by the upper house in mid-October, “to establish true transparency in the consulting services“.
“This is a cross-partisan amendment for real transparency“, explained the communist senator Eliane Assassi. The Minister of Public Accounts, Gabriel Attal, for his part asked for his withdrawal. This measure will certainly not be retained in the end by the government, which should again use article 49.3 of the Constitution before the National Assembly on the budget.
Read alsoConsulting firms: the executive chooses a minimum framework
“The Government has taken no steps to include (the Senate bill) on the agenda of the National Assembly“, deplores the amendment tabled by the chairman of the Senate inquiry committee Arnaud Bazin (LR) and the communist rapporteurs Éliane Assassi and Cécile Cukierman.
Two open investigations
Published on March 16, the report of the Senate commission of inquiry into the growing influence of private consulting firms on public policies, initiated by the majority communist CRCE group, ensured that the contracts signed between the State and the cabinets hadmore than doubledbetween 2018 and 2021, for a record amount of over €1 billion in 2021.
Read also“McKinsey affair”: senators want to keep the pressure on the government
The opposition immediately demanded the opening of an investigation into the links between the Macronist majority and McKinsey. The Senate report also pointed to a possible tax arrangement for McKinsey’s French entities, which would have allowed them to pay no corporate tax between 2011 and 2020.
Two investigations have been opened by the courts into the intervention of consulting firms in Emmanuel Macron’s electoral campaigns in 2017 and 2022, to try to find out whether they have not unduly benefited from funding in return for public contracts. .