the University of Tours taken at fault by the General Inspectorate

How to explain that a medical student in Tours was able to continue his studies in Limoges after the filing of five complaints against him for acts of rape and sexual assault that occurred between 2013 and 2020? This is a textbook case, revealing the dysfunctions of the university in the treatment of sexual and gender-based violence, on which the general inspection of education, sport and research has looked. She has just submitted a progress note to the office of the Minister of Higher Education, whose The world echoed.

In mid-April 2022, inscriptions in black capital letters on a white background appeared on the walls of the Faculty of Medicine in Tours. “Today your rapist, tomorrow your doctor” ; “Here are trained and protected from rapists” : the messages, pasted by a feminist collective, are explicit and the excitement is real. After two months of pre-trial detention, between September and November 2020, a student accused of rape and sexual assault by female students was able to register at the Faculty of Medicine of Limoges, to continue his course there, pending the holding of his trial. The young man, aged 24, completed an internship in the gynecology department of a hospital center in New Aquitaine.

Read also Article reserved for our subscribers Paris-VIII University criticized for its action deemed insufficient against sexual violence

In their preliminary report, Patrick Allal and Cristelle Gillard, co-responsible for the mission on sexual and sexist violence at the general inspectorate, report a paradox: real responsiveness on the part of the presidency of the University of Tours and the dean of the medical school, and a complete gender confusion when it came to taking concrete action against the student.

Legal skills

When filing the first complaint at the Tours police station, the police officer had encouraged the complainant to alert the listening unit of her establishment. A meeting was organized immediately afterwards by the president of the university, with the dean of the faculty of medicine and the doctors of the CHU. Two decisions came out of it: issue an order prohibiting the student’s access to premises and internships within the CHU, and initiate disciplinary proceedings. “It is this protocol provided for universities that should have made it possible to deal with the situationobserves Patrick Allal. Except that nothing happened after this meeting, except that the dean of the medical school received the students. »

Patrice Diot, the dean, conducts the interviews himself, exceeding his rights, since the conduct of an administrative inquiry is the responsibility of the president of the university. The public prosecutor, who is conducting his judicial investigation, urges the dean to stop these hearings so as not to interfere with his own work. An injunction which, according to Patrick Allal, would have been interpreted by the university as a form of exemption from conducting a disciplinary investigation against the student. “There is a real problem of legal skills at this levelanalyzes the Inspector General. The current criminal investigation was not at all a ban on carrying out an administrative investigation. »

You have 42.29% of this article left to read. The following is for subscribers only.

source site-20