this sad gesture that “made his blood boil” after the death of Diana

What’s next after this ad

NEWS
LETTERS

fun, news, tips… what else?

It was an event that truly upset Prince Harry… The betrayal of Paul Burrell, Lady Diana’s former butler, who did not hesitate to publish a book and divulge information about the late princess.

It’s D-Day: Tuesday, January 10, 2023. Prince Harry’s autobiographical book Substitute (Spare in English) is finally officially available. And if we know that Prince William, Kate Middleton or even Queen Consort Camilla take it for their ranks, obviously, they are not the only ones. Indeed, the Duke of Sussex releases his truths on the royals, but also on the relatives of his family who have no had no qualms about betraying him. Like Paul Burrell, the former butler of his mother Princess Dianawho had done “boil his blood” when he published a book about her after her death. In his book, Meghan Markle’s husband firmly accuses Paul Burrell, without naming him, of having used the death of Lady Diana to make money by publishing the book HAS Royal Duty, in which he made a series of private revelations. Paul Burrell, 64, served as a footman to the late Queen Elizabeth II and then served as butler to the late Diana for 10 years, until her death in 1997. At the time of the book’s publication, in 2003, Paul Burrel had drawn heavy criticism from the royal family. An official statement from Princes Harry and William, and King Charles III (at the time still Prince of Wales) had even been released by Clarence House and underlined the “cold and manifest betrayalfrom the former royal staff member.

What’s next after this ad

A tough time for Harry

Also in his memoir, Prince Harry describes how he learned about Paul Burrell’s book while working as an unpaid farm laborer in Australia aged 19 in 2003, after leaving college. of your. He explains that he received a parcel from Buckinghamfilled with notes from the palace communications team on “a tricky business“.”Mom’s former butler wrote a reveal book that ultimately says nothing“, did he declare. “It was just one man’s self-justified, self-absorbed version of events. My mother once called this butler a dear friend, trusted him implicitly. U.S. too. And now this“. And to end with confidence: “He took advantage of her disappearance for money. It made my blood boil“Harry had wanted to go home to”to confront“Paul Burrell, but Charles and William talked him out of it, saying all they could do was”pronounce a united condemnation“. The Duke of Sussex also claims that he has “nothing to do with writing” of the Clarence House statement and that for his part he would be “went much further“. A meeting should have taken place between Harry, William and Paul Burrell, so that the latter could “say what he thinks“. An interview that Harry had been waiting for”looking forward“, but that never happened.”I did not know why. I assume the Palace canceled it. I said to myself ‘what a shame’“.

Passionate about fashion, beauty and people, she will be able to reveal the latest information on women’s news. Without forgetting the secrets of the royal elite and in particular of the British monarchy, which …

source site-35