Three months firm ban on practicing required against lawyer Fabrice Di Vizio


The lawyer, who became known during the movement of “yellow vests” and for his defense of antivax, is being prosecuted for having failed “in the essential principles of the legal profession”.

The antivax lawyer is in the hot seat. Six months of prohibition to practice the profession of lawyer, including three farms, were required Tuesday against Me Fabrice Di Vizio, figure of the opposition to the health pass, during a stormy disciplinary hearing before the council of the Paris Bar Association. The decision will be rendered on November 2 at the latest, announced the President of the Bar Pierre-Olivier Sur at the end of this public hearing which lasted more than four hours, punctuated by suspensions and peppered with invective between the five defense lawyers. , the accusation and the formation of judgment.

“Rude words”

Me Di Vizio is prosecuted for having missed “to the essential principles of the legal profession” and in particular for having held on his Twitter account and in the show Do not touch My TV (TPMP) on C8 comments “coarse”, “vulgar” and “offensive”, recalled the judgment formation. He is also accused of having written on Twitter that he wanted to terminate the contract of one of his collaborators in the firm because she had agreed to be vaccinated, and of having incited his audience to multiply the recourses against the health pass and vaccination, “without making the public aware of the hazards and the judicial time”.

During the hearing, which was attended by more than 200 of his supporters, Me Di Vizio, round glasses and bald head, acknowledged most of the comments made on Twitter and invoked his “strengthened freedom of expression” as part of a “public interest debate”. “If I want to be Donald Trump or Bolsonaro, I am Donald Trump or Bolsonaro”launched the lawyer, stressing that his insults were “mainly intended for the President of the Republic and the government”. The lawyer notably distinguished himself by complaints which contributed to the opening of a judicial investigation at the Court of Justice of the Republic in July 2020, aimed in particular at Édouard Philippe, Olivier Véran and Agnès Buzyn for their management of the crisis. sanitary.

He is also at the origin of other massive appeals, which have however all been dismissed by the CJR, and defended the controversial professor Didier Raoult. “The dress we wear (…) is also worn because it is deserved and symbolizes a function (…) which obliges us”said Me Edmond-Claude Fréty, who represented the prosecuting authority and also requested against the lawyer a ban on standing for professional elections for 10 years. “Do you want to be the tweet police, to be the TPMP police?”asked one of Me Di Vizio’s advisers, Me Julia Courvoisier. “When we put our finger in this cycle of accusations on Twitter, we take risks”, added his colleague, Me Ouadie Elhamamouchi, calling for caution on pain of seeing people exhume tweets and initiate proceedings against lawyers.


SEE ALSO – Who are the sanitary anti-passes?



Source link -94