Three of the seven state civil service unions announced Thursday that they would vote in favor of the draft agreement on additional social protection (PSC), suggesting the possibility of a majority agreement on Friday.
The fateful bar of 50%, an essential condition for the validation of the agreement, is approaching: with this triple green light from Unsa, the CFDT and the CGT, the signatory unions total this stage nearly 42% of the votes in the recent professional elections.
Force Ouverte, the leading union of the FPE (17.1% of the vote in the 2018 elections), is meeting its Bureau on Friday. The three other representative organizations (FSU, Solidaires, CFE-CGC) have planned to give their opinion in the coming days.
The result of the vote is watched by the 2.5 million civil servants of the State.
If the principle of the assumption by the State, from 2024, of 50% of the contributions of its agents to complementary health (mutual insurance for the most part) is acted by ordinance, it remained indeed to define the perimeter of the basket of care to which this percentage would apply.
However, in the event of majority agreement, the agents will benefit from a basket of quality care, well above the minimum provided for by the Social Security Code, underlined Thursday morning the CFDT Public functions (4th), first union to give its green light.
Judging to have obtained significant advances in terms of social justice, and access to care for agents, regardless of their status, the organization received a unanimous mandate from its ten federations.
In the middle of the afternoon, it was from the chimneys of the UFSE-CGT (5th) that white smoke came out, with a large majority internal vote, said a union source in a message to AFP.
Your projects at the best rate thanks our comparison of consumer loans
Unsa FP (3rd) also voted in favor at the end of the day, an internal source said.
Presented at the beginning of January to the unions, the draft agreement provides in particular for mechanisms of solidarity with the beneficiaries of the agents and the withdrawals, to limit the amount of their contributions.
The precise terms of these mechanisms were the subject of long negotiations with the Minister of Transformation and the Public Service, as well as the compulsory nature of adherence to future collective contracts entered into by employers with complementary bodies.