‘Too beautiful to be sad’: Julie Bertin puts it back on after her separation from Benoit Paire

If we hadn’t really seen them together for several weeks, the (brutal and uncompromising) confirmation of Julie Bertin arrived yesterday. The influencer is definitely no longer in a relationship with Benoit Pair. “I want to remain silent, I want to protect certain things but I am certainly not a buffoon, even less when I leave time for the person to refocus supposedly on his sport, but he prefers to send DM all the chicks and secretly date them”she swung yesterday in her Instagram story.

A real bomb, a few days after the touching confessions of the 33-year-old tennis player on the very bad patch he is currently experiencing. Visibly affected by the actions of Benoît Paire, the beautiful 30-year-old brunette nevertheless decided to turn the page as soon as possible, as she proved in the rest of her Instagram story yesterday. Followed by more than 410,000 subscribers, she left a message to make it clear that she intends to recover very quickly from this breakup. “Thank you so much for all your messages, but don’t worry about me, I’m way too beautiful to be sad for too long”she says while driving her car.

Upcoming projects, but before the fiesta in Saint-Tropez for Julie

The message is clear for Julie Bertin and the former reality TV candidate revealed in the show 10 Perfect Couples 3 does not intend to mope and she already has plenty of projects in mind. “Am I going to take the opportunity to launch my Youtube channel to tell you about my life?”, she asks her community. To be sure to forget her heartache as quickly as possible, she also decided to go party in one of the most appropriate places to let go. “We are going to raise Saint-Tropez friends”she writes after having traveled from Montpellier to the Côte d’Azur to party (the stories can be found in the slideshow).

Determined to forget Benoît Paire as quickly as possible, Julie Bertin already seems to have moved on, but is it the same for the tennis player? Nothing is less sure…

source site-110