Trump ally wants details of his fortune excluded from foreign agent lawsuit


Prosecutors charged Barrack, 75, with using his influence between 2016 and 2018 to advance UAE foreign policy goals without notifying the U.S. Attorney General of his involvement as required by law.

Barrack, who supported Trump’s 2016 White House run and headed his inauguration committee, pleaded not guilty and faces trial September 19 in federal court in Brooklyn.

In a court filing, Barrack’s lawyers accused prosecutors of seeking to introduce evidence that would improperly appeal to jurors’ “class bias” against wealthy people.

While the specific impugned evidence relating to Barrack has been redacted, Barrack’s attorneys have said the “photographs of his personal property” and other details are “unnecessarily prejudicial” and “have no place in this trial”.

‘Evidence of too many summer homes would be highly relevant if Mr Barrack was judged for his success, but he is not,’ they wrote.

Mr. Barrack’s attorneys cited a 2007 Forbes report https://www.forbes.com/2007/09/18/richlist07_Investments_slide/?sh=493939bd7e5c listing his $2.3 billion net worth as evidence that he was wealthy long before he allegedly worked for the UAE.

“The level of achievement achieved by Mr. Barrack in a lifetime of painstaking effort belies the government’s assertion that he suddenly risked everything, at the age of 70, to become the agent of a foreign power,” they added.

A spokesperson for the Brooklyn U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to comment.

Barrack was arrested in 2021 and released on $250 million bail.

He left his role as managing director and executive chairman of digital infrastructure-focused private equity firm DigitalBridge Group Inc, formerly known as Colony Capital.



Source link -88