US Exit from the World Health Organization: WHO’s Efforts to Convince Trump

US Exit from the World Health Organization: WHO's Efforts to Convince Trump

The World Health Organization (WHO) plays a vital role in global health, successfully eradicating diseases like smallpox. Recent intentions by US President Donald Trump to withdraw from the WHO have raised concerns among experts, given the US’s significant financial contributions. Reactions include disappointment from the WHO and warnings from health officials about the potential impacts on global health initiatives. Experts argue that withdrawal could diminish US influence and hinder future pandemic preparedness, emphasizing the necessity of continued collaboration.

The WHO’s Vital Role in Global Health

The World Health Organization (WHO) has successfully eradicated diseases like smallpox and plays a crucial role during health emergencies. However, recent developments have emerged as the new US President, Donald Trump, expresses intentions to withdraw from this essential UN agency. Experts are raising concerns about this potential move, emphasizing the significance of the US as the WHO’s largest donor.

Trump’s Withdrawal Plans and Global Reactions

Donald Trump had previously attempted to leave the WHO during his first term, and now he is reiterating his desire to exit the organization again. Shortly after assuming office, he initiated the process, which requires a one-year waiting period before the decision can take effect. Trump has justified his stance by claiming that the US contributes disproportionately to the organization compared to nations like China. Alongside halting financial contributions, he also aims to withdraw personnel involved with the WHO.

Reactions to this announcement have been mixed, ranging from disappointment to disbelief. The WHO voiced hope that the United States would reconsider its decision, emphasizing the organization’s critical role in safeguarding health globally, including that of American citizens. They highlighted the progress made in collaboration with the US towards enhancing effectiveness and cost-efficiency.

In a significant policy shift, Trump is enacting a series of decrees affecting both domestic and international relations. His decision has sparked widespread concern among health officials and experts.

Financial Contributions and Global Health Impact

In the years 2022 to 2023, the US was the largest contributor to the WHO, donating $1.28 billion, with Germany and the Gates Foundation following with $856 million and $830 million, respectively. The total budget for 2024-2025 is set at $6.83 billion, with mandatory contributions calculated based on economic performance rather than population size. Currently, the US accounts for 22 percent of mandatory contributions, while China and Germany contribute 15.3 percent and 6.1 percent, respectively. However, mandatory contributions make up less than 20 percent of the total budget, with the majority coming from voluntary donations.

In response to Trump’s announcement, the Chinese Foreign Ministry affirmed its commitment to supporting the WHO and enhancing its role in promoting global health.

German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach described Trump’s decision as a severe setback for international efforts to combat health crises. He warned that the absence of US contributions would significantly impede assistance to countries grappling with outbreaks and disasters, putting countless lives, especially children’s, at risk. Germany plans to engage with the US to encourage a reconsideration of this withdrawal.

Expert Opinions on the Consequences of Withdrawal

Experts have expressed alarm at Trump’s decision, pointing out that abandoning the WHO would not lead to improvements in its efficiency. Former senior US health official Tom Frieden emphasized that the withdrawal could weaken the US’s influence and heighten the risk of future pandemics, making everyone less safe. Lawrence Gostin from Georgetown University warned that leaving the organization would result in the US missing out on crucial epidemic monitoring data, potentially jeopardizing future health responses and vaccine access.

Reflecting on Trump’s earlier criticisms of the WHO during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clear that his administration’s stance has not changed. Previously, Trump accused the organization of being overly accommodating towards China, which he believed contributed to the virus’s global spread. Following his first term, President Joe Biden reversed the decision to withdraw just before it could take effect, as stipulated by WHO regulations.

The WHO has been instrumental in eradicating and controlling several deadly diseases, including smallpox and polio, underscoring the importance of continued support and collaboration in global health efforts.