which one is the most ecological?

The difference between a natural Christmas tree and an artificial Christmas tree is not only aesthetic or fragrant, it also has a significant environmental impact. We tell you which of the two is the most eco-responsible as the end-of-year holidays approach.

The Christmas markets are opening one after the other all over France, the first raclettes have already been tasted and Netflix has just revealed its program for the month of December, with the arrival of several Christmas films… There is no longer any doubt, the end of year holidays are approaching. It’s the final stretch to make all the necessary purchases to make it a convivial moment, whether it’s gifts for young and old, or exceptional dishes. But it is also the privileged period to set up the traditional Christmas tree which you may have already purchased last week to benefit from attractive Black Friday offers. If so, there is a good chance that you have opted for a artificial tree.

Many French people wonder what the environmental difference is between an artificial tree and a natural fir. What choice should we make to be the most respectful of the environment? Our colleagues from Numerama looked into the question and revealed the results of their investigation which is based on several studies.

The rest after this ad

Two options for the same reflection

There are obviously several factors to take into account before making your choice. It cannot be emphasized enough that most artificial trees purchased commercially are made from plastica material made from chemicals and petroleum, and which generates a lot of greenhouse gas emissions. What’s more, plastic is harder to recycle and is not in the Top 10 biodegradable materials… Add to this that most artificial trees come from China. In other words, their delivery to France requires transport solutions such as ocean liner, with all that this implies on the environmental level.

Our colleagues also point out that certain inexpensive products would not have “not seen the shadow of an approval”. Finally, to obtain the balance between the environmental impact between an artificial tree and a natural tree, it is necessary to count between 10 and 20 years old according to the different studies observed. Which means that, if you opt for an artificial tree, you have to hope to keep it for a long time. In this case, it is better to avoid cheap items and choose a “luxury tree” which will stand the test of time.

What about the natural Christmas tree? Be aware that you are not participating in deforestation by preferring the natural tree or artificial tree, because entire forests are dedicated exclusively to the end-of-year celebrations, to meet the high demand in November and December, particularly in the United States where 350 million of this type of conifers currently grow. You still need to be sure of its origin so as not to lose your Co2 savings! The mentions Fleurs de France and Plante Bleue should catch your attention. Also, the natural fir offers different recycling options, even if it means ending up in composting. So, have you already made your choice?

Journalist

If writing is a pleasure, being read is even more so. Passionate about pop culture, Jonathan sets the pace in the right tone to always keep you well informed. Attracted by …

source site-40