Things are moving forward and becoming clearer in the Jubillar affair, with a reconstitution which should take place on December 13 and which promises to make a lot of noise.
It is in the evening of next Tuesday, December 13 that the reconstruction of the case of the disappearance and murder of Delphine Jubillar will take place in Cagnac-les-Mines in the Tarn. A delicate but highly anticipated event, in particular by the relatives of the victim who thus hope to be able to discover new elements and understand certain situations of the evening of December 15 to 16, 2020, this terrible night during which Delphine Jubillar has disappeared. The reconstruction and transport to the scene could constitute the last judicial step before the case is closed by the judges, as explained by The Dispatch. On June 18, 2021, Cédric Jubillar, Delphine’s husband, was indicted for voluntary spousal homicide. For 18 months, he has been placed in solitary confinement in the Seysses remand center, since he is to date the main suspect in the murder of his 33-year-old wife, whose the body remains untraceable. Although Cédric Jubillar denies any involvement in this affair, and that he remains presumed innocent of the facts of which he is accused, the reconstitution scheduled for December 13 could change everything and allow the veil to be lifted on many details.
What’s next after this ad
A reconstruction under high tension
The summons for the reconstruction of the night of the disappearance and murder of Delphine Jubillar, from the two investigating judges Audrey Assemat and Coralyne Chartier, was sent to the various parties concerned. And it stipulates in particular that the cell phones are strictly prohibited : “We inform you that the telephones of all participants will not be allowed in the security perimeter.”. A reconstruction under high voltage therefore, from which no leakage will be tolerated. Indeed, still according to The Dispatchthis express request is primarily intended to avoid any risk of leaks or recordings in this most publicized affair and this since the beginnings. According to the president of the union of magistrates (USM), Ludovic Friat: “As a general rule, the examining magistrate ensures the police of the act that he orders. And when it comes to such a high-profile dossier, there is nothing surprising“. He also explained that “the judges are masters of their instruction and set the limits and the rules to be applied. A reenactment is an act of instruction covered by secrecy and mobile phones constitute a risk since there may be participants filming, commenting live… The idea is to avoid this kind of thing”. All is said. What is certain is that this reconstitution should, with laptops or not, have significant repercussions.