Amber Heard reveals a detail that could have changed everything

She has not said its last word. A few days after the announcement of the verdict in her trial against her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, Amber Heard still does not recover. As a reminder, the Fairfax Court jury found the two stars guilty of defamation of each other. A juror had also explained that he had difficulty believing in the sincerity of the 36-year-old actress. “Her crying, her facial expressions, her gaze fixed on the jury… She made us all uncomfortable” he confided.

“She was answering a question crying and two seconds later she was going cold as an ice cube” he added, adding that the two actors had also been very violent towards each other. The jury’s decision, not surprisingly, sparked strong reactions on social media. Faced with criticism, the actress seen in Aquaman continues to defend herself. She took advantage of her time on the set of the Today program presented by Savannah Guthrie, on NBC, to give her version of this highly publicized trial.

Johnny Depp trial: could the verdict have been different?

Following the lawsuit against Johnny Depp, the American actress had to pay over $8 million to her ex-husband. But according to Amber Heard, this verdict could have been different if she had been able to present among the evidence her “entire binder” of evidence. According to her, this included “therapist notes and text messages” who could have play in the jury’s final decision. The notes she speaks of would detail the abuse she allegedly suffered. victim between 2012 and 2016. There would also be “messages in which she appeared to tell her father that Mr. Depp had hit her on a plane” but also notes that say Amber Heard confided in her therapist that “Mr Depp had hit him and thrown him to the ground”. “The notes and texts were not admitted as evidence in the case after the judge ruled them inadmissible” then specifies the newspaper L’independent this Monday, June 20. Could these notes really have changed the verdict of the trial between Amber Heard and her ex-husband? A verdict to which the actress has decided to appeal. His lawyer continues to accuse the jury of not having been impartial in this case, in particular by leaving influenced by social networks that demonized the actress. “They came home every night. They have families. Their families are on social media. We had a 10-day break in the middle of the trial… It’s impossible they weren’t influenced by that.” explains Elaine Bredehoft.