Coignard – Pension reform: is the break necessary?


Reserved for subscribers

CHRONIC. A break, suggests Laurent Berger, but what for? A resumption of dialogue, on the other hand, is imperative, and without precondition.




By Sophie Coignard

Emmanuel Macron did not pull out of his sleeve a disruptive solution as he had invented it at the twilight of the Yellow Vests crisis.
Emmanuel Macron did not pull out of his sleeve a disruptive solution as he had invented it at the twilight of the Yellow Vests crisis.
 © YOAN VALAT / POOL / EPA POOL / EPA

Published on


Premium Subscriber-only audio playback

I subscribe to 1€ the 1st month


VS’is an old road safety slogan: “On long journeys, a break is in order. ” But it was the secretary general of the CFDT who brought it up to date on Tuesday: “It would be madness on the part of those who govern us not to take a break”, declared Laurent Berger on France Inter. A madness ? Perhaps it should not be overstated. Especially since this claim is not new. It has been made many times over the past few weeks. But the proposal he made, with the consent of the inter-union, deserves to be heard: mediation, to break the impasse.

It was received in different ways by the presidential majority. Rather warmly by the Modem, which is considering a way out of the lasting political and social crisis. More…




Source link -82