In Vendée, a man convicted of fraud made the task of investigators easier by using his real name and bank details for his misdeeds, an unusual approach in the world of fraud.
The digital age is witnessing various deceptions, ranging from the most ingenious to the most burlesque. Among them, some stand out from the rest by their originality, like that of an Irish woman losing a colossal sum following a simple photo on Facebook, or the strange disappearance of a radio antenna in Alabama, reminiscent of the magic tricks of a certain David Copperfield. These incidents, although distant, share a common thread with our Vendée history: the audacity of the protagonists.
It is in this context that the case of a man in Vendée, having decided to borrow an atypical path to say the least in the world of fraud. Offering discounted gaming consoles, its deal seemed too good to be true. And for good reason, despite the apparent good deal, cheated customers would never see the color of the promised products. What distinguishes this case from classic scams is none other than the use by the scammer of their own personal informationgreatly facilitating the work of investigators.
This game console scammer was just caught because he was using his own data
The individual’s modus operandi was unusual to say the least: posing as a seller of game consoles at knockdown prices, it attracted many victims looking for bargains. The consoles, allegedly out of stock in stores, were offered at prices several hundred euros lower than market prices. The victimsconvinced by the promise of a golden deal, hastened to pay the requested amountsto finally find ourselves without news of their purchase so hoped for.
Also read – He withdraws €90,000 thanks to an ATM bug, his bank takes him to court
Which particularly simplified the work of investigatorsis that the crook did not hesitate to provide your real identity and his bank details. His criminal record, with convictions for similar facts, only reinforced the court’s decision. The sentence handed down by the court was twelve months in prison, four of which were suspended for two years, including obligations for care and compensation for victims. The firm part of the sentence must be carried out under an electronic bracelet, which represents a less severe measure than incarceration but nevertheless significant, given the nature of the facts.
Source: actu.fr