“He takes us for idiots”: Rothen pin Leonardo on the management of the Mbappé file at PSG


The former player and now consultant has not mince words against the sports director of PSG, guilty in his eyes of not telling the truth.

In his show “ Rothen ignites “On RMC, the former midfielder of PSG (2004-2009) does not hesitate to deliver the bottom of his thoughts. This is its role and listeners expect frank and clear-cut positions. On the issue of Kylian Mbappé’s contract extension at PSG which drags on and does not bode well for Parisian supporters, Jérôme Rothen did not beat around the bush when commenting on Leonardo’s recent exit. The sporting director of PSG, in an interview with Europe 1 on Sunday, had notably confided that there was “ still good possibilities ”To see the 23-year-old world champion stay in the capital beyond next June. Words that do not have more to the former French international (13 selections).

SEE AS ​​WELL – The qualification of PSG against Feignies-Aulnoye

He tells what he wants to tell, he takes us for idiots, he mocked Monday night on RMC. If there is someone who is in the wrong place to talk about Kylian Mbappé, it is him. He who spent more than a year having strained relations with Mbappé and the Mbappé clan. For a player that you absolutely want to extend, that leaves a lot to be desired. “And Rothen to continue:” Rather than selling us dreams and trying to restore your image, tell us about the things that annoy and be a little sincere with people because today you are unmasked. He lacks sincerity on Mbappé.

Close to the Mbappé family and author of a noted interview with the PSG striker last October, Jérôme Rothen believes that everything points to the star’s departure next June, at the end of his contract. “ The interview last week with Kylian Mbappé in Paris Match, where he announces that he wants to travel, to discover other things, other countries, everything is against an extension, says Rothen . Whatever Leonardo says.


SEE ALSO – Football: can PSG win the Champions League?



Source link -94