In an interview for La Dépêche, the lawyer for the children of the Jubillar couple returned to their son’s statements which contradict those of Cédric Jubillar.
Still unanswered questions. Since the night of December 15 to 16, 2020, Delphine Jubillar has not been found. His loved ones are desperate to find out the truth about what may have happened to him. Her husband, Cédric Jubillar, is still in prison after an indictment on June 18 for “Intentional homicide of a spouse”. While his lawyers made a new request for release on September 14, the answer to which will be known on September 21, one of Louis and Elyah’s lawyers, the children of the Jubillar couple, decided to speak.
In the pages of La Dépêche du Midi, Maître Laurent Bouguet confided in the testimony of Louis, the eldest son of the 6-year-old couple, who has already been heard twice by investigators. The one who talks about “Bickering” between his parents would have delivered several details that intrigue the lawyers. “These statements come in opposition to what Cédric Jubillar tells us since he tells us that he was woken up by his daughter’s tears and that he got up”. But according to Louis, “He didn’t hear his little sister cry that night…”.
The night of Delphine Jubillar’s disappearance, the child said he had “heard swear words and described a scene that could be likened to an argument”. The little boy would “see nothing” but he would have heard one of his parents say “So since that’s it, we’re going to separate.” Another detail that Maître Boguet would like to underline: Louis would not have “Not heard the dogs barking” as however indicated his father to the investigators. If these comments remain to be studied, they contradict the version of the facts of Cédric Jubillar who remains the main suspect of the case for the moment.
“We are on a stubborn quest for the truth”
For the time being, Maître Boguet affirms it: “We are on a stubborn quest for the truth. At some point we will have to tell these children, your father is innocent or guilty. Right now, we don’t build someone’s innocence out of it. approximations. We must obtain sensible answers to questions which still remain unanswered “. For him, all the elements that complete the file must be reported “objectively ” and children cannot go unanswered. “We owe them the truth, beyond their suffering, they must know what happened”, adding that it is “The best service that we can render (them) and that there will be no half-truth”.