Jubillar case: the investigation takes the wrong direction

The trail of the ex-companion of Delphine Jubillar’s lover would have been followed wrongly? Driven by the defense of Cédric Jubillar, the husband of the nurse who disappeared almost a year ago, the thesis of an involvement of the ex-wife would ultimately be quite light. They are our colleagues from Parisian which underline the lack of tangible evidence accusing the ex-companion of Delphine’s lover.

On December 15, 2020, the day of the disappearance, Delphine Jubillar and her lover’s ex-wife were in contact. The two women exchanged during this day about the relationship between Delphine and her lover and the future separation of the married couple. Indeed, shortly before the disappearance of Delphine Jubillar, the wife of his lover discovered their affair. Text messages exchanged between Delphine and her friend prove that the lover would have asked to separate from his wife. Following this revelation, two women had repeated conversations and reportedly entered into a non-aggression pact to deal with this difficult situation.

Rivals exchange text messages and calls

In total, the two women had eight telephone conversations, including calls and texts. Their exchanges seemed serene and diplomatic.

The last message was sent by Delphine Jubillar at 2:22 p.m., according to The Parisian. In this final text, the nurse pledged to distance herself from her lover and his family. “I’m going to step aside, be discreet, let you digest the news and leave you with your family as you wish. Good day”, writes Delphine Jubillar to his lover’s wife.

Misinterpretation of the 145 appeals

The second lead that led to the ex-companion of Delphine Jubillar’s lover was the presence of 145 calls to an unknown number on her telephone record. In reality, it is not necessarily a question of calls but of 145 Internet data consumptions between December 14 and 16. This means that the lover’s ex-wife could have simply connected to the internet, used various connected mobile applications or simply read his emails or converse through instant messengers. It is impossible to trace exactly the nature of these connections and / or calls.

In addition, on the day of the disappearance, the lover’s ex-companion can prove that several witnesses saw her. The latter explained to investigators that on the evening of December 15, when France was under curfew, she returned home as usual and went to bed with her husband at 11 p.m. The next day, she got up to take her children to school.

At present Cédric Jubillar, the husband of the missing remains the main suspect in this case. His defense also regrets that the investigations on the ex-companion of the lover are not further developed.

source site-35