PARIS (awp/afp) – It was the first criminal trial in France of the “uberization”, it is now the time of the decision for Deliveroo, judged in March for having employed as independent delivery men who should, according to the prosecution, have been salaried.
The Paris Criminal Court will make its decision Tuesday at 1:30 p.m.
After a week of trial, the prosecution had requested the maximum penalty of 375,000 euros in fine against Deliveroo France, as well as a year in prison suspended against two former French managers of the company.
The prosecutor had “regretted” the absence on the bench of the defendants of the American William Shu, big boss of the British company and “unquestionably” at the origin of the “system” which allowed Deliveroo to benefit from “all the advantages of the employer”, “without the disadvantages”.
Deliveroo is indeed responsible for “an instrumentalization and misappropriation of labor regulations”, with the aim of organizing a “systemic concealment” of jobs for deliverers who should have been salaried and not independent, had hammered Céline Ducournau .
The prosecutor had listed at length everything that demonstrated the “directives”, “controls and “sanctions” characterizing the employer-employee relationship: “statistics” on delivery times, detailed training videos, precise rules on how to deliver. .
The “fraud” put in place had the sole purpose of employing its deliverers “at a lower cost”, and it does not matter if some are “satisfied” with this status or “feel free”, she had underlined, in reference to the one of Deliveroo’s arguments to justify the status of auto-entrepreneur.
“It is not about the trial of poor working conditions”, nor that of “modes of consumption of our time”, had retorted in defense Antonin Lévy, the lawyer for Deliveroo France, for whom the trial sometimes took airs of “political forum”.
“Freedom”
A dozen delivery men on bicycles or scooters, many now committed against the “system”, had marched to the bar to tell their arrival at Deliveroo, attracted by the promises of “freedom” and “flexibility” but had discovered the “war” to get the best time “slots”, “pressure”, “surveillance” and reprimands from Deliveroo. In total, more than a hundred are civil parties to the trial.
Deliveroo maintained that it was only “connecting” customers, restaurateurs and deliverers, and denied “any relationship of subordination”.
“What is an employee? Someone who chooses whether today he wants to come to work? Someone who can work for your worst competitor? Who can refuse an order? No, it’s not that an employee, there is no relationship of subordination”, had pleaded Me Antonin Lévy for Deliveroo. “Freedom is not the absence of constraints,” he added, asking for release, like the advice of former officials.
For the two successive leaders of Deliveroo France over the period concerned, from 2015 to 2017, the prosecutor requested a one-year suspended prison sentence and a fine of 30,000 euros. For a third executive, she requested four months of suspended imprisonment and a fine of 10,000 euros.
The prosecutor also wanted as an additional penalty “the display and dissemination” of the court decision, in particular in front of the premises of Deliveroo for two months, as well as on the home page of the site and the mobile application of the platform – a sentence thought for the “current workers” of the platform, she specified.
The Urssaf claims for its part 9.7 million euros to make up for the social security contributions avoided by the use of independent deliverers.
Highly contested, the independent status of Uber drivers or Deliveroo couriers is called into question in many countries by the courts or, more rarely, by laws which have prompted certain giants in the sector to propose compromises.
mdh/cb.npk