The British Minister of Justice, Dominic Raab, estimated on Thursday June 16 that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) should not have blocked the expulsion of migrants to Rwanda, warning that he wanted to legislate to be able to ignore certain injunctions of this instance.
Read alsoMigrants: how the relocation of asylum seekers is systemic in Rwanda
Tuesday evening, a plane specially chartered for hundreds of thousands of euros was ready to take off from an English military base, when the ECHR, the jurisdiction of the Council of Europe ensuring compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights , expressed his opposition. The Court based in Strasbourg considered that the British justice should examine in detail the legality of the device, which is planned for July, before deporting migrants. Dominic Raab stressed that the UK judiciary – High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court – had considered urgent appeals by human rights defenders and refugee supporters and had not opposed the deportations .
“I think that when three courts – and I have great respect for the judicial system of this country – have dismissed the subject, it is not right for Strasbourg to intervene as it has“said the minister on SkyNews. “The Strasbourg Court itself has declared for many years that it has no power to issue binding injunctions. And then later they said: “In fact, we can make such judgments binding. It is not based on the (European) Convention on Human Rights,” the minister said.
Read alsoCancellation of British migrant flight: Rwanda says it is “not discouraged”
The recent ECHR decision reinforces the need for the UK to reform human rights law, he says, with a new ‘Bill of Rights’ which would ensure the government can ignore this type of ECHR decisions. “Our Bill of Rights will correct this“, assured the minister. After the derailment of its project, the British government expressed its determination to continue with its strategy, despite criticism.