Ecology Even if catastrophism sells newspapers, it is irresponsible to present the worst-case scenario as the most likely, according to these researchers.
© HANDOUT / Courtesy of Marcia Macmillan / AFP
By Sandra Esser *
Published on
– Modified
Copied link
Copy link
Dn the article “Emissions – the“ business as usual ”story is misleading”, climate researchers Zeke Hausfather and Glen Peters offer a new perspective on how to better frame the narrative around the consequences of climate change. Opposing the representation of the most catastrophic outcome as the most likely, the researchers argue that a more nuanced approach based on the likelihood of various climate change scenarios would allow more efficient climate policy making.
! – capsule link read_also –
READ ALSOClimate: don’t believe the alarmists
The article looks at the period leading up to the publication of the sixth and final assessment report (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on the Evolution of the Cl …
Comment
You can no longer react to articles following the submission of contributions that do not meet the Point’s moderation charter.
You can no longer react to articles following the submission of contributions that do not meet the Point’s moderation charter.