This Wednesday, January 12, Raphaël Enthoven was invited to the C à Vous set to promote his latest book, Krasnaïa. The essayist took the opportunity to talk about his missing friends, Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff, who had given their support to Didier Raoult.
At the turn of 2022, the Bogdanoff brothers bowed out, a week apart. A tragic double disappearance, which also revived the debate on vaccination. Indeed, neither Igor nor Grichka were vaccinated against Covid-19. After catching the virus in mid-December, they were both hospitalized, then placed in intensive care, before being swept away by the disease.. Following their death, several of their relatives assured in the media that the two brothers were not anti-vaccines, but simply that they favored natural treatments. “IThey weren’t trying to evangelize anyone on this subject! It was really a decision, or a non-decision, very personal“, explained Amélie de Bourbon-Parme, the ex of Igor Bogdanoff, adding that they had”phobia of doctors and drugs “.
But now, in early December, during an interview with France Bleu, the two brothers said they were close to the positions of Professor Didier Raoult, who has long expressed reservations about mRNA vaccines. “We sincerely believe that Didier Raoult, whose scientific background is indisputable and superior to most of those who criticize him, has answers,” said Igor Bogdanoff. The excerpt from the interview in question was rebroadcast this Wednesday on the set of C à Vous, under the eyes of Raphaël Enthoven, a great friend of the two brothers. The latter deplored the influence of the Marseille professor on the Bogdanoff brothers. “It breaks my heart“, answers the essayist in reaction to the images.”They believed Didier Raoult, they died of it. Here it is, this is what happened. “Then he adds:”I think they disagree with themselves today. ”
Raphaël Enthoven violently criticizes Didier Raoult
A few moments earlier, Raphaël Enthoven had not mince words with Didier Raoult. “This man has always said anything! “, he had launched before adding: “Couldn’t he be right every now and then? If we review all of his statements, we live in a parallel world! We are in the presence of someone who is objectively dangerous! “
Loading widget
Subscribe to the Closermag.fr newsletter to receive the latest news free of charge