Is the mystery of little Grégory’s death finally solved 40 years later? This Thursday, March 14, an investigator made surprising revelations in an interview with Ciné Télé Revue. Explanations.
Will the truth about the assassination of little Grégory soon be revealed? On February 28, Jacques Pradel and Francois Daoust published a book entitled: Technical and scientific police: The Shock of the Future. In this work, the authors analyze the impact of technological advances in the context of police investigations. As part of the promotion of his live, François Daoust who is the former director of the Criminal Research Institute of the National Gendarmerie, gave an interview to Ciné-Télé-Revue.
And in this interview, François Daoust did not fail to mention the affair of little Grégory. An old affair 40 years which has, however, never been elucidated. At least in the eyes of the general public, because it seems that the investigators know exactly what happened and who the culprit is.
The rest after this ad
The affair of little Grégory never resolved
As a reminder, little Grégory Villemin, only 4 years old, was found dead on October 19, 1984. His lifeless body was found tied up in Vologne, in Lépanges-sur-Vologne, in the Vosges. A murder which was accompanied by numerous letters sent to Grégory’s parents, from a crow. Murielle Bolle, a family member, confessed while in police custody that his brother-in-law Bernard Laroche killed the 4-year-old child and that she was present at the time of the kidnapping and murder.
The rest after this ad
But instead of questioning Bernard Laroche, Judge Lambert preferred to go away for the weekend. As a result, Murielle Bolle retracted her statements. But not enough to convince Jean-Marie Villemin, Grégory’s father who shot him in March 1985. Bernard Laroche then died, taking his secrets to the grave. And after many twists and turns, the mystery of this affair was ultimately never elucidated. But for François Daoust, the matter has been clarified for a long time.
Surprising statements
“Off the record, we know what happened. Officially, we can’t say it. We can’t report it, otherwise we risk being sued for defamation. But there was everything”, declared François Daoust. Before specifying that a “procedural error”, prevents the indictment of the culprit.
The rest after this ad
“The truth is that there were analyses, interrogations which were good and which gave us the answer. But as this was canceled for a procedural error, we can no longer work on these seals and we can no longer re-examine in the same conditions one of the protagonists who had given all the elements and the temporality: ‘It happened like this, at such a time, in such a place…'”, he explains. Statements that risk causing a reaction.
Passionate about women’s news, Agathe has been deciphering the latest trends for aufeminin since 2022. Her favorite areas? Psychology, nutrition and well-being advice, without forgetting the tips…